Landesliga - Salzburg·
Salzburg - 28·06/03/2026·04:00 PM
Anthering
Anthering
LDWWD
1-5
Finished
HT0-2
Bürmoos
Bürmoos
DLWWW
📍 Haunsbergarena, Anthering
Season statsLandesliga - Salzburg
Anthering17matchesBürmoos18matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Landesliga - Salzburg.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
58%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

56%
1190
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1366
55%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

59%
61%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

53%
3.06
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.52

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1718
1.06
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

2.11
29%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

67%
18%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

11%
53%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

22%
0%
Clean Sheet19%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

39%
24%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

17%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1718
1.65
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.33
76%
Scored > 0.580%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

83%
88%
Over 1.583%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

78%
76%
Over 2.572%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

67%
71%
Over 3.560%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

50%
76%
BTTS63%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

50%
29%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

33%
31%
Scored Both Halves32%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

33%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1718
2.53
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.06
0%
Clean Sheet19%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

39%

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1718
25%4/16
Leading at HT38%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

50%9/18
38%6/16
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

28%5/18
38%6/16
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

22%4/18
75%12/16
HT/FT Same Outcome74%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

72%13/18
75%3/4
Led at HT → Won88%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%9/9
0%0/6
Trailed at HT → Recovered13%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

25%1/4

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeAnthering at home · Bürmoos on the road
109
1.00
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

2.00
30%3/10
Win Rate48%

Share of sampled matches won.

67%6/9
60%6/10
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

33%3/9
1.80
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.44
2.40
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.22
0%0/10
Clean Sheet17%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%3/9
80%8/10
BTTS68%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

56%5/9
70%7/10
Over 2.574%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

78%7/9