Serie A·
Regular Season - 18·05/30/2026·08:30 PM
Gremio
Gremio
DWWDW
1-3
Finished
HT1-1
Corinthians
Corinthians
LWDLW
Neutral📍 Arena do Grêmio, Porto Alegre
Season statsSerie A
Gremio17matchesCorinthians17matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Serie A.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
68%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

57%
1559
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1693
65%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

60%
71%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

54%
2.67
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.17

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1717
1.24
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.24
29%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

29%
35%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

35%
35%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

35%
29%
Clean Sheet35%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

41%
35%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

29%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1717
1.12
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.88
65%
Scored > 0.568%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

71%
71%
Over 1.565%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

59%
35%
Over 2.532%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

29%
12%
Over 3.515%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

18%
53%
BTTS50%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

47%
18%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

6%
18%
Scored Both Halves12%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

6%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1717
1.18
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.06
13.24
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

12.06
4.24
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.12
2.94
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.18
69%
Save %73%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

77%
29%
Clean Sheet35%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

41%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1717
0.93
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

0.74
1.49
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.02
-0.56
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.28
0.23
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.18
0.08
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.06

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1717
11.41
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

11.06
3.65
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.06
6.12
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

6.12
54%
Box Shot %54%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

55%
32%
On-Target %30%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

28%
10%
Shot Conversion9%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

8%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1717
50%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

54%
84%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

83%
408.53
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

420.59
-0.00
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.08

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1717
18%3/17
Leading at HT15%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

12%2/17
59%10/17
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

53%9/17
24%4/17
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

35%6/17
59%10/17
HT/FT Same Outcome65%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

71%12/17
67%2/3
Led at HT → Won83%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%2/2
25%1/4
Trailed at HT → Recovered21%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

17%1/6

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 17/1717/171717
6%
0-15'9%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

13%
6%
16-30'15%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

25%
22%
31-45'14%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

6%
39%
46-60'29%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

19%
22%
61-75'14%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

6%
6%
76-90+'18%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

31%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 17/1717/171717
29%4/14
Scored First39%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

50%7/14
71%10/14
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

50%7/14
50%2/4
Win when Scoring First61%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

71%5/7
30%3/10
Win when Conceding First15%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/7
41'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

34'
34'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

25'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 17/1717/171717
12%2/17
Scored after 75'21%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

29%5/17
6%1/17
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

12%2/17
100%4/4
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%4/4
0%0/4
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/4
0%0/17
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/17

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 17/1717/171717
94%17/18
Open-Play Share94%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

94%15/16
6%1/18
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

0%0/16
0%0/18
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

6%1/16
10%2/21
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

12%2/17
5%1/21
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/17

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1717
3.88
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.53
4.47
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.76
46%
Corner Share48%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

49%
-0.69
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.08
65%11/17
Match Corners > 8.559%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

53%9/17
41%7/17
Match Corners > 9.544%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

47%8/17
12%2/17
Match Corners > 10.521%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

29%5/17

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 17/1717/171717
2.29
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.59
18%3/17
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

18%3/17
13.12
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

13.94
94%15/16
Match Cards > 3.591%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

88%15/17
16/17
63%10/16
Match Cards > 4.572%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

82%14/17
16/17
55%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

63%