Premier Division·
Regular Season - 21·06/19/2026·06:45 PM
Bohemians
Bohemians
WLWWW
VS
Dundalk
Dundalk
WDWLD
📍 Dalymount Park, Dublin
Season statsPremier Division
Bohemians20matchesDundalk19matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Premier Division.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
65%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

60%
1485
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1393
57%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

55%
72%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

65%
3.84
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.81

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2019
1.70
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.53
45%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

37%
35%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

42%
20%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

21%
35%
Clean Sheet28%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

21%
15%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

11%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2019
1.55
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.63
85%
Scored > 0.587%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

89%
70%
Over 1.580%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

89%
55%
Over 2.556%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

58%
35%
Over 3.539%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

42%
65%
BTTS67%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

68%
25%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

16%
25%
Scored Both Halves31%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

37%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2019
1.05
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.47
9.40
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

13.74
3.00
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.47
1.90
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.84
63%
Save %63%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

64%
35%
Clean Sheet28%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

21%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2019
2.14
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.01
1.01
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.49
1.14
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.49
-0.43
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.59
0.13
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.06

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2019
15.45
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

15.68
5.35
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

6.00
10.60
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

9.26
69%
Box Shot %64%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

59%
35%
On-Target %36%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

38%
10%
Shot Conversion10%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

10%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2019
59%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

50%
79%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

68%
480.20
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

369.37
0.18
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.00

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2019
35%7/20
Leading at HT41%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

47%9/19
40%8/20
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

21%4/19
25%5/20
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

32%6/19
55%11/20
HT/FT Same Outcome49%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

42%8/19
71%5/7
Led at HT → Won58%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

44%4/9
60%3/5
Trailed at HT → Recovered55%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

50%3/6

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 20/2019/192019
13%
0-15'13%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

14%
22%
16-30'21%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

21%
0%
31-45'7%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

14%
22%
46-60'14%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

7%
22%
61-75'13%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

3%
22%
76-90+'32%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

41%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 20/2019/192019
76%13/17
Scored First72%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

68%13/19
24%4/17
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

32%6/19
62%8/13
Win when Scoring First58%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

54%7/13
25%1/4
Win when Conceding First13%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/6
28'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

36'
28'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

16'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 20/2019/192019
35%7/20
Scored after 75'41%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

47%9/19
20%4/20
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

37%7/19
89%8/9
Lead Saved after 75'74%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

60%3/5
11%1/9
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

40%2/5
5%1/20
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/19

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 20/2019/192019
81%26/32
Open-Play Share87%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

93%27/29
16%5/32
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

7%2/29
3%1/32
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/29
5%1/20
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

7%2/30
0%0/20
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

7%2/30

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2019
5.95
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

6.11
4.00
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.84
60%
Corner Share58%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

56%
2.14
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

1.21
60%12/20
Match Corners > 8.569%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

79%15/19
55%11/20
Match Corners > 9.564%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

74%14/19
45%9/20
Match Corners > 10.554%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

63%12/19

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 20/2019/192019
1.75
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.47
5%1/20
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

26%5/19
10.75
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

10.84
67%12/18
Match Cards > 3.575%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

83%15/18
18/2018/19
56%10/18
Match Cards > 4.558%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

61%11/18
18/2018/19
74%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

65%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeBohemians at home · Dundalk on the road
109
1.40
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.00
30%3/10
Win Rate21%

Share of sampled matches won.

11%1/9
20%2/10
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

22%2/9
1.30
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.44
1.20
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

2.00
20%2/10
Clean Sheet10%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

0%0/9
80%8/10
BTTS79%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

78%7/9
50%5/10
Over 2.553%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

56%5/9
2.22
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

0.82
1.01
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

2.02