Eliteserien·
Regular Season - 11·05/29/2026·05:00 PM
Fredrikstad
Fredrikstad
DWLLL
2-1
Finished
HT0-1
Start
Start
WLLDL
📍 Fredrikstad Stadion, Fredrikstad
Season statsEliteserien
Fredrikstad10matchesStart11matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Eliteserien.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
46%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

35%
1579
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1603
49%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

39%
43%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

31%
2.96
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

4.03

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1011
1.10
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

0.64
30%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

9%
20%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

36%
50%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

55%
0%
Clean Sheet5%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

9%
20%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

18%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1011
1.30
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.09
80%
Scored > 0.581%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

82%
100%
Over 1.5100%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

100%
70%
Over 2.558%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

45%
40%
Over 3.538%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

36%
80%
BTTS76%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

73%
30%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

0%
10%
Scored Both Halves5%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

0%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1011
1.90
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

2.36
14.80
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

14.91
5.80
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

5.18
3.70
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.64
64%
Save %57%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

51%
0%
Clean Sheet5%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

9%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1011
1.21
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.17
1.72
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.68
-0.51
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.51
0.03
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.03
0.10
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.10

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1011
11.60
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

11.00
4.00
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.55
7.70
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.45
66%
Box Shot %67%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

68%
34%
On-Target %33%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

32%
11%
Shot Conversion11%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

10%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1011
47%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

40%
79%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

71%
423.30
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

343.73
-0.05
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.22

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1011
20%2/10
Leading at HT24%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

27%3/11
40%4/10
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

27%3/11
40%4/10
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

45%5/11
60%6/10
HT/FT Same Outcome53%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

45%5/11
100%2/2
Led at HT → Won67%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

33%1/3
25%1/4
Trailed at HT → Recovered33%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

40%2/5

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 10/1011/111011
0%
0-15'8%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

17%
18%
16-30'13%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

8%
27%
31-45'34%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

42%
0%
46-60'8%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

17%
18%
61-75'13%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

8%
36%
76-90+'22%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

8%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 10/1011/111011
20%2/10
Scored First33%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

45%5/11
80%8/10
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

55%6/11
50%1/2
Win when Scoring First35%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

20%1/5
25%2/8
Win when Conceding First13%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/6
27'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

22'
29'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

26'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 10/1011/111011
40%4/10
Scored after 75'29%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

18%2/11
40%4/10
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

36%4/11
0/0
Lead Saved after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

50%1/2
0/0
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

50%1/2
0%0/10
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

9%1/11

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 10/1011/111011
100%11/11
Open-Play Share96%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

92%11/12
0%0/11
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

8%1/12
0%0/11
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/12
5%1/21
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

4%1/27
10%2/21
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/27

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1011
4.50
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

3.45
5.30
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

6.00
46%
Corner Share41%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

37%
-0.98
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-3.02
70%7/10
Match Corners > 8.558%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

45%5/11
50%5/10
Match Corners > 9.543%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

36%4/11
40%4/10
Match Corners > 10.538%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

36%4/11

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 10/1011/111011
1.70
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.00
0%0/10
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

9%1/11
11.80
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

12.82
63%5/8
Match Cards > 3.563%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

63%5/8
8/108/11
63%5/8
Match Cards > 4.544%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

25%2/8
8/108/11
70%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

67%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeFredrikstad at home · Start on the road
46
1.75
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

0.17
50%2/4
Win Rate25%

Share of sampled matches won.

0%0/6
25%1/4
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

83%5/6
1.75
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.00
1.25
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

3.17
0%0/4
Clean Sheet0%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

0%0/6
100%4/4
BTTS83%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

67%4/6
75%3/4
Over 2.571%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

67%4/6
1.49
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

0.95
1.57
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.89