Superettan·
Regular Season - 10·05/30/2026·01:00 PM
Falkenbergs FF
Falkenbergs FF
WWLDW
2-1
Finished
HT0-0
Oddevold
Oddevold
WWDDW
📍 Falcon Alkoholfri Arena, Falkenberg
Season statsSuperettan
FF9matchesOddevold9matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Superettan.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
68%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

67%
1453
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1398
71%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

57%
65%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

76%
3.11
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.41

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
99
2.00
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.67
56%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

44%
33%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

33%
11%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

22%
22%
Clean Sheet17%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

11%
11%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

0%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
99
1.78
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.11
89%
Scored > 0.594%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

100%
78%
Over 1.583%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

89%
67%
Over 2.572%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

78%
44%
Over 3.556%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

67%
67%
BTTS78%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

89%
33%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

33%
44%
Scored Both Halves50%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

56%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
99
1.22
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.67
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

13.00
0/91/9
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

6.00
0/92/9
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

4.00
0/91/9
Save %

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

33%
0/92/9
22%
Clean Sheet17%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

11%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
99
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.49
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.77
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.28
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.26
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.19

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
99
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

8.00
0/91/9
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

5.00
0/92/9
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

4.00
0/91/9
Box Shot %

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

50%
0/91/9
On-Target %

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

125%
0/91/9
Shot Conversion

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

13%
0/91/9

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
99
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

46%
0/92/9
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

65%
0/91/9
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

318.00
0/91/9
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.09

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
99
44%4/9
Leading at HT67%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

89%8/9
44%4/9
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

11%1/9
11%1/9
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

0%0/9
44%4/9
HT/FT Same Outcome44%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

44%4/9
75%3/4
Led at HT → Won63%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

50%4/8
100%1/1
Trailed at HT → Recovered

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0/0

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 9/99/999
13%
0-15'25%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

37%
13%
16-30'9%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

5%
25%
31-45'20%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

16%
13%
46-60'14%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

16%
6%
61-75'8%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

11%
31%
76-90+'24%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

16%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 9/99/999
67%6/9
Scored First83%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

100%9/9
33%3/9
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

0%0/9
83%5/6
Win when Scoring First64%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

44%4/9
0%0/3
Win when Conceding First

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0/0
33'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

18'
34'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 9/99/999
33%3/9
Scored after 75'33%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

33%3/9
44%4/9
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

67%6/9
80%4/5
Lead Saved after 75'70%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

60%3/5
20%1/5
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

40%2/5
0%0/9
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/9

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 9/99/999
81%13/16
Open-Play Share88%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

95%18/19
13%2/16
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

5%1/19
6%1/16
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/19
0%0/11
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

0%0/15
9%1/11
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/15

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
99
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

7.50
0/92/9
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.00
0/92/9
Corner Share

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

65%
0/92/9
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

3.56
0/0
Match Corners > 8.5

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

100%2/2
0/92/9
0/0
Match Corners > 9.5

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

50%1/2
0/92/9
0/0
Match Corners > 10.5

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

50%1/2
0/92/9

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 9/99/999
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.33
0/93/9
0/0
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

0%0/3
0/93/9
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

11.00
0/93/9
17%1/6
Match Cards > 3.523%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

29%2/7
6/97/9
17%1/6
Match Cards > 4.523%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

29%2/7
6/97/9
63%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

60%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeFF at home · Oddevold on the road
54
2.00
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.75
60%3/5
Win Rate55%

Share of sampled matches won.

50%2/4
20%1/5
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

25%1/4
1.20
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.50
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

2.25
40%2/5
Clean Sheet20%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

0%0/4
40%2/5
BTTS70%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

100%4/4
40%2/5
Over 2.570%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

100%4/4
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.49
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.77