Úrvalsdeild·
Regular Season - 10·06/16/2026·07:15 PM
Stjarnan
Stjarnan
LWLLD
VS
Breidablik
Breidablik
LWLWD
Season statsÚrvalsdeild
Stjarnan10matchesBreidablik9matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Úrvalsdeild.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
43%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

55%
1550
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1484
43%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

62%
42%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

48%
3.54
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

5.13

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
109
1.00
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.67
30%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

44%
10%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

33%
60%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

22%
0%
Clean Sheet17%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%
10%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

11%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
109
1.80
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.44
90%
Scored > 0.589%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

89%
90%
Over 1.584%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

78%
80%
Over 2.573%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

67%
70%
Over 3.563%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

56%
90%
BTTS78%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

67%
30%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

22%
30%
Scored Both Halves43%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

56%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
109
2.20
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.67
0%
Clean Sheet17%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
109
30%3/10
Leading at HT43%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

56%5/9
40%4/10
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

22%2/9
30%3/10
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

22%2/9
20%2/10
HT/FT Same Outcome43%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

67%6/9
33%1/3
Led at HT → Won47%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

60%3/5
67%2/3
Trailed at HT → Recovered33%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/2

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 10/109/9109
22%
0-15'18%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

13%
11%
16-30'14%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

17%
17%
31-45'17%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

17%
28%
46-60'25%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

22%
11%
61-75'10%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

9%
11%
76-90+'16%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

22%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 10/109/9109
50%5/10
Scored First56%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

63%5/8
50%5/10
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

38%3/8
40%2/5
Win when Scoring First50%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

60%3/5
20%1/5
Win when Conceding First27%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

33%1/3
17'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

17'
31'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

7'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 10/109/9109
20%2/10
Scored after 75'27%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

33%3/9
40%4/10
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

22%2/9
100%2/2
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%4/4
0%0/2
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/4
0%0/10
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/9

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 10/109/9109
100%18/18
Open-Play Share91%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

83%19/23
0%0/18
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

13%3/23
0%0/18
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

4%1/23
9%2/22
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

14%2/14
0%0/22
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/14

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 10/109/9109
89%8/9
Match Cards > 3.594%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

100%8/8
9/108/9
56%5/9
Match Cards > 4.565%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

75%6/8
9/108/9
71%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

70%