Virsliga·
Regular Season - 18·06/17/2026·03:00 PM
Tukums
Tukums
LLLDD
VS
Auda
Auda
WWWLL
Season statsVirsliga
Tukums16matchesAuda16matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Virsliga.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
34%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

74%
1351
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1372
45%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

70%
22%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

78%
4.03
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.28

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1616
0.81
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

2.12
13%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

69%
44%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

6%
44%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

25%
6%
Clean Sheet19%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

31%
6%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

6%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1616
1.81
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.00
94%
Scored > 0.594%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

94%
100%
Over 1.594%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

88%
75%
Over 2.572%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

69%
44%
Over 3.538%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

31%
88%
BTTS75%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

63%
6%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

38%
31%
Scored Both Halves41%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

50%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1616
1.88
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.25
6%
Clean Sheet19%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

31%

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1616
25%4/16
Leading at HT38%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

50%8/16
25%4/16
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

25%4/16
50%8/16
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

25%4/16
69%11/16
HT/FT Same Outcome72%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

75%12/16
50%2/4
Led at HT → Won75%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%8/8
25%2/8
Trailed at HT → Recovered25%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

25%1/4

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 16/1616/161616
9%
0-15'9%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

9%
12%
16-30'14%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

16%
24%
31-45'25%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

25%
15%
46-60'19%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

22%
6%
61-75'8%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

9%
33%
76-90+'26%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

19%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 16/1616/161616
44%7/16
Scored First53%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

63%10/16
56%9/16
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

38%6/16
29%2/7
Win when Scoring First59%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

90%9/10
0%0/9
Win when Conceding First17%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

33%2/6
28'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

34'
15'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

20'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 16/1616/161616
50%8/16
Scored after 75'44%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

38%6/16
13%2/16
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

31%5/16
50%2/4
Lead Saved after 75'69%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

88%7/8
50%2/4
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

13%1/8
0%0/16
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/16

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 16/1616/161616
82%27/33
Open-Play Share86%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

91%29/32
3%1/33
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

9%3/32
15%5/33
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/32
4%1/26
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

5%1/20
4%1/26
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/20

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 16/1616/161616
77%10/13
Match Cards > 3.588%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

100%16/16
13/16
62%8/13
Match Cards > 4.575%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

88%14/16
13/16
66%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

67%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeTukums at home · Auda on the road
88
1.12
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

2.38
25%2/8
Win Rate50%

Share of sampled matches won.

75%6/8
38%3/8
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

13%1/8
2.25
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.63
1.50
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.13
13%1/8
Clean Sheet25%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

38%3/8
88%7/8
BTTS75%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

63%5/8
75%6/8
Over 2.563%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

50%4/8