Serie B·
Regular Season - 10·05/24/2026·10:00 PM
Avai
Avai
DLDWD
0-2
Finished
HT0-0
Goias
Goias
WLWLL
Neutral📍 Estádio da Ressacada, Florianópolis
Season statsSerie B
Avai9matchesGoias9matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Serie B.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
52%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

51%
1473
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1461
54%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

49%
49%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

53%
2.63
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

1.82

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
99
1.11
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.44
22%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

44%
44%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

11%
33%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

44%
44%
Clean Sheet39%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%
33%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

33%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
99
1.11
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.00
67%
Scored > 0.567%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

67%
67%
Over 1.561%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

56%
44%
Over 2.539%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

33%
22%
Over 3.528%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

33%
44%
BTTS39%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

33%
0%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

11%
33%
Scored Both Halves28%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

22%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
99
1.22
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.33
12.56
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

10.89
4.67
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.22
4.25
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.50
8/98/9
81%
Save %77%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

74%
44%
Clean Sheet39%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
99
1.56
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

0.98
1.52
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.09
0.04
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.11
-0.30
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.08
0.14
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.09

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
99
12.00
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

9.56
3.44
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

2.56
6.44
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

5.33
54%
Box Shot %55%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

56%
29%
On-Target %28%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

27%
9%
Shot Conversion10%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

10%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
99
51%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

52%
8/9
77%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

83%
8/9
357.56
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

413.50
8/9
0.01
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.01

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
99
22%2/9
Leading at HT22%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

22%2/9
56%5/9
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

67%6/9
22%2/9
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

11%1/9
67%6/9
HT/FT Same Outcome50%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

33%3/9
50%1/2
Led at HT → Won50%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

50%1/2
0%0/2
Trailed at HT → Recovered0%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/1

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 9/99/999
0%
0-15'5%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

10%
20%
16-30'15%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

10%
20%
31-45'25%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

30%
0%
46-60'5%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

10%
20%
61-75'15%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

10%
40%
76-90+'35%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

30%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 9/99/999
71%5/7
Scored First69%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

67%6/9
29%2/7
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

33%3/9
40%2/5
Win when Scoring First53%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

67%4/6
0%0/2
Win when Conceding First0%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/3
40'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

47'
28'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

66'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 9/99/999
44%4/9
Scored after 75'39%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

33%3/9
22%2/9
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

44%4/9
100%1/1
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%3/3
0%0/1
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/3
0%0/9
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/9

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 9/99/999
90%9/10
Open-Play Share80%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

70%7/10
10%1/10
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

20%2/10
0%0/10
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

10%1/10
36%4/11
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

0%0/11
0%0/11
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/11

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
99
4.63
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

3.88
8/98/9
4.38
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.38
8/98/9
51%
Corner Share47%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

42%
8/98/9
-0.46
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.95
63%5/8
Match Corners > 8.556%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

50%4/8
8/98/9
38%3/8
Match Corners > 9.538%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

38%3/8
8/98/9
25%2/8
Match Corners > 10.531%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

38%3/8
8/98/9

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 9/99/999
3.67
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.56
11%1/9
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

44%4/9
13.89
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

12.89
100%8/8
Match Cards > 3.593%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

86%6/7
8/97/9
100%8/8
Match Cards > 4.579%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

57%4/7
8/97/9
54%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

49%