Ýokary Liga·
Regular Season - 14·06/20/2026·03:00 PM
Merw
Merw
LLLLL
VS
Şagadam
Şagadam
LLDLD
Season statsÝokary Liga
Merw12matchesŞagadam12matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Ýokary Liga.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
21%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

34%
1119
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1223
33%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

37%
9%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

31%
3.79
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

1.89

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1212
0.92
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.00
25%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

25%
17%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

25%
58%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

50%
8%
Clean Sheet21%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%
33%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

42%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1212
1.08
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.92
67%
Scored > 0.563%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

58%
92%
Over 1.579%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

67%
67%
Over 2.550%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

33%
42%
Over 3.538%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

33%
67%
BTTS54%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

42%
25%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

8%
43%
Scored Both Halves29%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

14%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1212
2.67
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.42
8%
Clean Sheet21%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1212
43%3/7
Leading at HT29%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

14%1/7
29%2/7
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

71%5/7
29%2/7
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

14%1/7
86%6/7
HT/FT Same Outcome71%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

57%4/7
100%3/3
Led at HT → Won100%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%1/1
0%0/2
Trailed at HT → Recovered0%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/1

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeMerw at home · Şagadam on the road
66
1.50
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

0.83
50%3/6
Win Rate33%

Share of sampled matches won.

17%1/6
50%3/6
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

50%3/6
1.50
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.83
2.50
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.17
0%0/6
Clean Sheet17%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%2/6
67%4/6
BTTS50%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

33%2/6
83%5/6
Over 2.558%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

33%2/6