Tasmania Southern Championship·
Regular Season - 10·06/13/2026·04:30 AM
New Town
New Town
DWWDW
VS
Taroona
Taroona
DWLLW
Season statsTasmania Southern Championship
Town8matchesTaroona9matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Tasmania Southern Championship.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
71%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

61%
1345
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1342
64%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

67%
78%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

54%
4.33
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

5.17

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
89
2.25
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.78
63%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

56%
38%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

11%
0%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

33%
13%
Clean Sheet23%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%
0%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

0%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
89
3.88
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

3.56
100%
Scored > 0.5100%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

100%
100%
Over 1.5100%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

100%
63%
Over 2.581%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

100%
50%
Over 3.569%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

89%
88%
BTTS77%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

67%
50%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

22%
50%
Scored Both Halves63%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

75%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
89
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.67
13%
Clean Sheet23%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
89
50%4/8
Leading at HT50%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

50%4/8
38%3/8
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

13%1/8
13%1/8
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

38%3/8
88%7/8
HT/FT Same Outcome75%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

63%5/8
100%4/4
Led at HT → Won88%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

75%3/4
100%1/1
Trailed at HT → Recovered67%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

33%1/3

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeTown at home · Taroona on the road
24
2.00
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.75
50%1/2
Win Rate50%

Share of sampled matches won.

50%2/4
0%0/2
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

25%1/4
3.50
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

4.25
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.25
0%0/2
Clean Sheet25%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

50%2/4
100%2/2
BTTS75%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

50%2/4
50%1/2
Over 2.575%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

100%4/4