CONMEBOL Sudamericana·
Group Stage - 6·05/27/2026·10:00 PM
Olimpia
Olimpia
WWWLW
3-1
Finished
HT0-0
A. Italiano
A. Italiano
WWLWL
Neutral📍 Estadio Defensores del Chaco

Stats below use each team's main league —Division Profesional - AperturaParaguay·Primera DivisiónChile

Last 10CONMEBOL Sudamericana
Olimpia10matchesItaliano10matches

Not in either team's main domestic league — every panel below reflects each team's most recent matches across all competitions.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
72%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

56%
1440
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1483
61%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

53%
82%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

60%
3.14
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.00

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1010
1.70
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.50
50%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

40%
20%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

30%
30%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

30%
20%
Clean Sheet15%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

10%
30%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

10%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1010
1.50
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.70
70%
Scored > 0.580%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

90%
80%
Over 1.590%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

100%
60%
Over 2.565%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

70%
30%
Over 3.530%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

30%
60%
BTTS70%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

80%
40%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

30%
30%
Scored Both Halves40%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

50%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1010
1.30
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.60
11.11
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

11.25
9/108/10
3.89
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.38
9/108/10
2.56
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.13
9/108/10
66%
Save %69%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

71%
9/108/10
20%
Clean Sheet15%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

10%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1010
1.62
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.41
0.99
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.57
0.63
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.16
0.04
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.16
0.10
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.12

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1010
17.00
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

11.88
9/108/10
5.89
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.25
9/108/10
10.56
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

5.13
9/108/10
62%
Box Shot %53%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

43%
9/108/10
35%
On-Target %31%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

27%
9/108/10
10%
Shot Conversion11%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

13%
9/108/10

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1010
61%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

53%
9/108/10
84%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

79%
9/108/10
472.78
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

371.13
9/108/10
0.18
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.02

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1010
20%2/10
Leading at HT25%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

30%3/10
30%3/10
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

40%4/10
50%5/10
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

30%3/10
50%5/10
HT/FT Same Outcome45%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

40%4/10
100%2/2
Led at HT → Won67%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

33%1/3
60%3/5
Trailed at HT → Recovered63%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

67%2/3

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 10/1010/101010
0%
0-15'0%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

0%
7%
16-30'6%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

6%
13%
31-45'21%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

29%
20%
46-60'19%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

18%
27%
61-75'22%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

18%
33%
76-90+'31%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

29%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 10/1010/101010
22%2/9
Scored First26%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

30%3/10
78%7/9
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

70%7/10
100%2/2
Win when Scoring First67%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

33%1/3
43%3/7
Win when Conceding First43%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

43%3/7
27'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

42'
38'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

32'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 10/1010/101010
40%4/10
Scored after 75'45%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

50%5/10
10%1/10
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

20%2/10
100%1/1
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%3/3
0%0/1
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/3
0%0/10
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

10%1/10

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 10/1010/101010
87%13/15
Open-Play Share79%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

71%12/17
13%2/15
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

24%4/17
0%0/15
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

6%1/17
8%1/13
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

12%2/17
0%0/13
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

12%2/17

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1010
6.11
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

3.25
9/108/10
2.78
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.25
9/108/10
69%
Corner Share53%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

38%
9/108/10
2.15
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-1.12
44%4/9
Match Corners > 8.553%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

63%5/8
9/108/10
33%3/9
Match Corners > 9.535%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

38%3/8
9/108/10
22%2/9
Match Corners > 10.524%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

25%2/8
9/108/10

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 10/1010/101010
2.44
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.50
9/108/10
0%0/9
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

13%1/8
9/108/10
9.33
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

11.50
9/108/10
89%8/9
Match Cards > 3.589%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

89%8/9
9/109/10
56%5/9
Match Cards > 4.556%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

56%5/9
9/109/10
58%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

71%