Super Liga·
Relegation Group - 37·05/24/2026·05:30 PM
Mladost Lucani
Mladost Lucani
WLWWD
1-0
Finished
HT1-0
Napredak
Napredak
DWLLL
Season statsSuper Liga
Lucani36matchesNapredak36matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Super Liga.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
63%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

40%
1393
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1248
56%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

30%
69%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

49%
2.64
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.32

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
3636
1.19
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

0.50
28%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

8%
36%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

25%
36%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

67%
25%
Clean Sheet19%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

14%
42%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

44%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
3636
0.89
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.83
58%
Scored > 0.557%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

56%
69%
Over 1.572%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

75%
42%
Over 2.551%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

61%
25%
Over 3.531%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

36%
50%
BTTS51%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

53%
19%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

6%
11%
Scored Both Halves13%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

14%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
3636
1.44
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

2.08
16.46
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

15.75
35/36
5.46
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

6.00
35/36
3.86
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.81
35/36
71%
Save %67%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

63%
35/36
25%
Clean Sheet19%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

14%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
3636
1.49
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.03
1.78
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

2.35
-0.29
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-1.32
-0.42
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.23
0.17
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.13

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
3636
8.54
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

9.14
35/36
2.77
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

2.50
35/36
5.71
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

5.67
35/36
67%
Box Shot %64%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

62%
35/36
32%
On-Target %30%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

27%
35/36
10%
Shot Conversion10%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

9%
35/36

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
3636
41%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

46%
35/36
73%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

74%
35/36
336.49
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

353.75
35/36
-0.17
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.08

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
3636
25%9/36
Leading at HT19%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

14%5/36
44%16/36
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

25%9/36
31%11/36
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

61%22/36
67%24/36
HT/FT Same Outcome71%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

75%27/36
67%6/9
Led at HT → Won63%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

60%3/5
18%2/11
Trailed at HT → Recovered16%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

14%3/22

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 36/3636/363636
18%
0-15'16%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

14%
9%
16-30'6%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

3%
18%
31-45'14%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

10%
24%
46-60'29%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

34%
12%
61-75'13%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

14%
21%
76-90+'22%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

24%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 36/3636/363636
43%13/30
Scored First31%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

19%6/32
57%17/30
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

81%26/32
46%6/13
Win when Scoring First40%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

33%2/6
24%4/17
Win when Conceding First14%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

4%1/26
22'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

13'
39'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

30'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 36/3636/363636
17%6/36
Scored after 75'18%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

19%7/36
33%12/36
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

28%10/36
70%7/10
Lead Saved after 75'60%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

50%1/2
30%3/10
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

50%1/2
6%2/36
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/36

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 36/3636/363636
76%26/34
Open-Play Share87%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

97%28/29
18%6/34
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

0%0/29
6%2/34
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

3%1/29
10%5/52
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

12%9/77
2%1/52
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

3%2/77

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
3636
3.29
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

3.67
35/36
5.83
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.78
35/36
36%
Corner Share37%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

39%
35/36
-2.43
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-2.35
63%22/35
Match Corners > 8.563%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

64%23/36
35/36
43%15/35
Match Corners > 9.548%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

53%19/36
35/36
37%13/35
Match Corners > 10.538%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

39%14/36
35/36

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 36/3636/363636
1.77
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.44
35/36
17%6/35
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

11%4/36
35/36
11.89
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

12.61
35/36
71%22/31
Match Cards > 3.576%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

81%25/31
31/3631/36
48%15/31
Match Cards > 4.550%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

52%16/31
31/3631/36
67%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

69%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeLucani at home · Napredak on the road
1718
1.47
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

0.39
35%6/17
Win Rate20%

Share of sampled matches won.

6%1/18
24%4/17
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

72%13/18
0.94
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.61
1.06
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

2.11
35%6/17
Clean Sheet29%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

22%4/18
53%9/17
BTTS46%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

39%7/18
35%6/17
Over 2.548%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

61%11/18
1.31
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.00
1.36
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

2.87