Friendlies·
Friendly International·06/09/2026·11:35 AM
China
China
WLWDW
0-0
Finished
HT0-0
Thailand
Thailand
DWWWW
Neutral📍 Hangzhou Dragon Stadium, Hangzhou
Last 10Friendlies
China10matchesThailand10matches

Not in either team's main domestic league — every panel below reflects each team's most recent matches across all competitions.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
54%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

72%
1362
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1506
45%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

68%
63%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

76%
2.20
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.74

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1010
1.30
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

2.20
40%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

70%
10%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

10%
50%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

20%
30%
Clean Sheet35%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

40%
50%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

10%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1010
0.80
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.50
50%
Scored > 0.570%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

90%
70%
Over 1.580%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

90%
30%
Over 2.550%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

70%
10%
Over 3.530%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

50%
20%
BTTS35%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

50%
10%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

30%
11%
Scored Both Halves36%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

60%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1010
1.30
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.00
9.00
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

11.33
4/103/10
2.25
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.33
4/103/10
1.25
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.00
4/103/10
56%
Save %58%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

60%
4/103/10
30%
Clean Sheet35%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

40%

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1010
10.50
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

10.67
4/103/10
2.25
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.67
4/103/10
7.25
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

6.33
4/103/10
69%
Box Shot %64%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

59%
4/103/10
21%
On-Target %33%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

44%
4/103/10
7%
Shot Conversion15%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

22%
4/103/10

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1010
45%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

51%
4/103/10
81%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

86%
4/103/10
351.25
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

414.67
4/103/10
-0.22
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1010
33%3/9
Leading at HT47%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

60%6/10
11%1/9
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

30%3/10
56%5/9
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

10%1/10
89%8/9
HT/FT Same Outcome74%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

60%6/10
100%3/3
Led at HT → Won92%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

83%5/6
0%0/5
Trailed at HT → Recovered0%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/1

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 9/1010/101010
0%
0-15'13%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

25%
33%
16-30'21%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

8%
33%
31-45'25%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

17%
17%
46-60'19%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

21%
0%
61-75'4%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

8%
17%
76-90+'19%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

21%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 9/1010/101010
44%4/9
Scored First62%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

80%8/10
56%5/9
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

20%2/10
100%4/4
Win when Scoring First94%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

88%7/8
0%0/5
Win when Conceding First0%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/2
44'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

19'
17'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

38'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 9/1010/101010
11%1/9
Scored after 75'26%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

40%4/10
11%1/9
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

20%2/10
100%3/3
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%6/6
0%0/3
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/6
11%1/9
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

10%1/10

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 9/1010/101010
67%4/6
Open-Play Share83%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

100%24/24
33%2/6
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

0%0/24
0%0/6
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/24
9%1/11
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

0%0/11
0%0/11
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

9%1/11

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1010
6.50
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

6.00
4/103/10
4.00
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.00
4/103/10
62%
Corner Share61%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

60%
4/103/10
2.00
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

50%2/4
Match Corners > 8.558%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

67%2/3
4/103/10
50%2/4
Match Corners > 9.558%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

67%2/3
4/103/10
50%2/4
Match Corners > 10.542%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

33%1/3
4/103/10

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 9/1010/101010
1.75
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.33
4/103/10
0%0/4
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

0%0/3
4/103/10
12.00
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

13.67
4/103/10
50%3/6
Match Cards > 3.547%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

44%4/9
6/109/10
33%2/6
Match Cards > 4.533%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

33%3/9
6/109/10
75%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

79%