Elite Two·
Relegation Group - 5·06/16/2026·03:00 PM
Bafmeng United
Bafmeng United
DDLWL
VS
Tonnerre
Tonnerre
LWWLW
Season statsElite Two
United17matchesTonnerre16matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Elite Two.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
52%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

59%
1250
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1229
54%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

51%
50%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

67%
2.53
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.55

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1716
1.29
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.19
35%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

38%
24%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

6%
41%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

56%
24%
Clean Sheet31%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

38%
41%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

44%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1716
1.00
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.13
59%
Scored > 0.558%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

56%
65%
Over 1.564%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

63%
35%
Over 2.540%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

44%
18%
Over 3.518%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

19%
41%
BTTS33%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

25%
18%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

6%
19%
Scored Both Halves24%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

30%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1716
1.18
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.19
24%
Clean Sheet31%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

38%

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1716
19%3/16
Leading at HT24%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

30%3/10
63%10/16
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

40%4/10
19%3/16
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

30%3/10
63%10/16
HT/FT Same Outcome66%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

70%7/10
100%3/3
Led at HT → Won100%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%3/3
0%0/3
Trailed at HT → Recovered0%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/3

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeUnited at home · Tonnerre on the road
88
2.12
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

0.75
63%5/8
Win Rate44%

Share of sampled matches won.

25%2/8
13%1/8
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

75%6/8
1.63
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.00
0.75
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.38
38%3/8
Clean Sheet31%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

25%2/8
50%4/8
BTTS44%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

38%3/8
38%3/8
Over 2.544%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

50%4/8