4. liga - Divizie C·
Division C - 30·06/13/2026·01:30 PM
Trutnov
Trutnov
WLLDW
VS
Turnov
Turnov
DLWLW
Season stats4. liga - Divizie C
Trutnov29matchesTurnov29matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in 4. liga - Divizie C.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
45%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

51%
1424
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1418
50%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

53%
40%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

49%
3.82
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

4.77

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2929
1.62
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.76
48%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

52%
17%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

21%
34%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

28%
21%
Clean Sheet21%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

21%
14%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

7%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2929
2.10
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.31
86%
Scored > 0.590%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

93%
90%
Over 1.593%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

97%
83%
Over 2.584%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

86%
55%
Over 3.557%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

59%
72%
BTTS72%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

72%
34%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

31%
45%
Scored Both Halves47%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

48%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2929
1.83
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.86
21%
Clean Sheet21%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

21%

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2929
34%10/29
Leading at HT38%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

41%12/29
45%13/29
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

41%12/29
21%6/29
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

17%5/29
59%17/29
HT/FT Same Outcome62%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

66%19/29
80%8/10
Led at HT → Won82%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

83%10/12
0%0/6
Trailed at HT → Recovered0%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/5

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeTrutnov at home · Turnov on the road
1414
1.71
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.43
50%7/14
Win Rate46%

Share of sampled matches won.

43%6/14
29%4/14
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

43%6/14
2.21
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.64
1.43
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

2.00
36%5/14
Clean Sheet21%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

7%1/14
64%9/14
BTTS75%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

86%12/14
79%11/14
Over 2.579%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

79%11/14