Veikkausliiga·
Regular Season - 10·06/13/2026·02:00 PM
VPS
VPS
DLWWD
VS
KuPS
KuPS
DDWWW
📍 Lemonsoft Stadion, Vaasa
Season statsVeikkausliiga
VPS9matchesKuPS11matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Veikkausliiga.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
67%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

68%
1388
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1584
68%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

65%
66%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

70%
2.72
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

1.66

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
911
1.44
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.82
33%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

45%
44%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

45%
22%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

9%
33%
Clean Sheet30%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

27%
44%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

18%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
911
0.89
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.45
56%
Scored > 0.569%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

82%
44%
Over 1.563%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

82%
22%
Over 2.529%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

36%
11%
Over 3.515%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

18%
44%
BTTS54%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

64%
22%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

27%
0%
Scored Both Halves14%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

27%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
911
0.78
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.91
7.50
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

3.00
2/91/11
2.50
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

2.00
2/91/11
1.50
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

1.00
2/91/11
60%
Save %55%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

50%
2/91/11
33%
Clean Sheet30%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

27%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
911
1.08
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

2.13
1.00
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.03
0.08
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

1.09
-0.04
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.48
0.12
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.13

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
911
7.00
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

23.00
2/91/11
3.50
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

10.00
2/91/11
5.50
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

12.00
2/91/11
79%
Box Shot %65%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

52%
2/91/11
50%
On-Target %47%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

43%
2/91/11
14%
Shot Conversion9%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

4%
2/91/11

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
911
43%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

68%
2/91/11
69%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

86%
2/91/11
266.00
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

578.00
2/91/11
-0.02
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.10

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
911
33%3/9
Leading at HT35%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

36%4/11
56%5/9
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

45%5/11
11%1/9
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

18%2/11
56%5/9
HT/FT Same Outcome60%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

64%7/11
67%2/3
Led at HT → Won71%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

75%3/4
100%1/1
Trailed at HT → Recovered75%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

50%1/2

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 9/911/11911
25%
0-15'22%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

19%
25%
16-30'13%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

0%
25%
31-45'28%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

31%
0%
46-60'9%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

19%
13%
61-75'9%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

6%
13%
76-90+'19%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

25%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 9/911/11911
57%4/7
Scored First59%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

60%6/10
43%3/7
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

40%4/10
50%2/4
Win when Scoring First58%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

67%4/6
33%1/3
Win when Conceding First29%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

25%1/4
19'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

28'
54'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

25'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 9/911/11911
11%1/9
Scored after 75'24%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

36%4/11
11%1/9
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

9%1/11
100%2/2
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%3/3
0%0/2
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/3
0%0/9
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

9%1/11

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 9/911/11911
75%6/8
Open-Play Share84%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

94%15/16
25%2/8
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

6%1/16
0%0/8
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/16
14%1/7
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

20%2/10
0%0/7
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/10

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
911
4.50
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

9.00
2/91/11
4.00
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

1.00
2/91/11
53%
Corner Share71%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

90%
2/91/11
0.48
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.33
50%1/2
Match Corners > 8.575%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

100%1/1
2/91/11
50%1/2
Match Corners > 9.575%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

100%1/1
2/91/11
50%1/2
Match Corners > 10.525%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

0%0/1
2/91/11

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 9/911/11911
2.50
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.00
2/91/11
0%0/2
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

0%0/1
2/91/11
13.50
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

13.00
2/91/11
86%6/7
Match Cards > 3.576%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

67%4/6
7/96/11
57%4/7
Match Cards > 4.554%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

50%3/6
7/96/11
76%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

68%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeVPS at home · KuPS on the road
44
2.00
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.25
50%2/4
Win Rate38%

Share of sampled matches won.

25%1/4
0%0/4
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

25%1/4
1.50
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.25
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.25
25%1/4
Clean Sheet13%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

0%0/4
75%3/4
BTTS75%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

75%3/4
50%2/4
Over 2.538%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

25%1/4
1.28
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

2.27
0.82
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.04