1. Division·
Regular Season - 10·05/31/2026·03:00 PM
Ranheim
Ranheim
LWLDW
5-1
Finished
HT3-0
Sandnes ULF
Sandnes ULF
WLWLL
Neutral📍 EXTRA Arena, Trondheim
Season stats1. Division
Ranheim8matchesULF9matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in 1. Division.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
46%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

49%
1570
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1382
53%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

45%
39%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

53%
4.43
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.65

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
89
1.62
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.11
50%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

33%
13%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

11%
38%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

56%
13%
Clean Sheet17%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

22%
13%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

33%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
89
2.63
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.22
88%
Scored > 0.577%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

67%
100%
Over 1.594%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

89%
88%
Over 2.560%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

33%
75%
Over 3.549%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

22%
75%
BTTS60%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

44%
38%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

11%
50%
Scored Both Halves36%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

22%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
89
2.13
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.44
13%
Clean Sheet17%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

22%

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
89
50%4/8
Leading at HT36%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

22%2/9
13%1/8
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

33%3/9
38%3/8
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

44%4/9
75%6/8
HT/FT Same Outcome76%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

78%7/9
75%3/4
Led at HT → Won88%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%2/2
33%1/3
Trailed at HT → Recovered17%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/4

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 8/89/989
15%
0-15'19%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

22%
5%
16-30'3%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

0%
25%
31-45'24%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

22%
35%
46-60'29%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

22%
10%
61-75'11%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

11%
10%
76-90+'16%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

22%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 8/89/989
63%5/8
Scored First48%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

33%3/9
38%3/8
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

67%6/9
60%3/5
Win when Scoring First80%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

100%3/3
33%1/3
Win when Conceding First17%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/6
19'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

27'
14'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

22'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 8/89/989
25%2/8
Scored after 75'24%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

22%2/9
50%4/8
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

22%2/9
100%3/3
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%2/2
0%0/3
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/2
0%0/8
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/9

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 8/89/989
95%19/20
Open-Play Share92%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

89%8/9
5%1/20
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

11%1/9
0%0/20
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/9
11%2/18
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

7%1/15
6%1/18
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

13%2/15

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 8/89/989
83%5/6
Match Cards > 3.575%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

67%6/9
6/8
33%2/6
Match Cards > 4.544%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

56%5/9
6/8
57%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

84%