USL W League·
Regular Season - 1·06/12/2026·11:00 PM
TLH Reckoning W
TLH Reckoning W
WDWWL
VS
Brevard Riptide W
Brevard Riptide W
WWLLW
Last 10USL W League
W10matchesW10matches

Season just started — only a handful of league matches played so far. Every panel below reflects each team's most recent matches across all competitions.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
75%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

57%
1281
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1232
70%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

54%
80%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

60%
3.08
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.47

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1010
2.20
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.80
70%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

60%
10%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

0%
20%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

40%
60%
Clean Sheet35%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

10%
10%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

30%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1010
2.70
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.60
90%
Scored > 0.580%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

70%
70%
Over 1.575%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

80%
60%
Over 2.565%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

70%
40%
Over 3.530%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

20%
30%
BTTS45%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

60%
10%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

50%
50%
Scored Both Halves46%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

43%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1010
0.70
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.40
60%
Clean Sheet35%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

10%

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1010
67%4/6
Leading at HT48%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

29%2/7
17%1/6
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

29%2/7
17%1/6
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

43%3/7
100%6/6
HT/FT Same Outcome79%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

57%4/7
100%4/4
Led at HT → Won100%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%2/2
0%0/1
Trailed at HT → Recovered17%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

33%1/3

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeW at home · W on the road
64
2.00
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.50
67%4/6
Win Rate58%

Share of sampled matches won.

50%2/4
33%2/6
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

50%2/4
2.67
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.50
0.83
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.25
67%4/6
Clean Sheet33%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

0%0/4
17%1/6
BTTS46%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

75%3/4
50%3/6
Over 2.563%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

75%3/4