Liga I·
Final·05/29/2026·05:30 PM
Dinamo Bucuresti
Dinamo Bucuresti
DDWLW
1-2
Extra Time
HT0-1AET0-1
FCSB
FCSB
DLDLW
Neutral📍 Stadionul Arcul de Triumf, Bucharest
Season statsLiga I
Bucuresti40matchesFCSB40matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Liga I.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
61%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

49%
1633
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1570
57%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

55%
65%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

42%
1.93
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.84

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
4040
1.62
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.52
43%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

43%
35%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

25%
23%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

33%
33%
Clean Sheet31%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

30%
20%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

23%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
4040
1.38
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.60
80%
Scored > 0.579%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

78%
73%
Over 1.571%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

70%
40%
Over 2.546%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

53%
20%
Over 3.530%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

40%
55%
BTTS55%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

55%
18%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

20%
23%
Scored Both Halves28%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

33%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
4040
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.30
10.30
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

10.30
3.38
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.45
2.42
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.23
72%
Save %68%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

64%
33%
Clean Sheet31%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

30%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
4040
1.81
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

2.83
0.96
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

0.68
0.85
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

2.15
-0.56
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-1.11
0.13
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.16

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
4040
13.90
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

17.88
5.15
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

6.10
9.88
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

11.25
71%
Box Shot %67%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

63%
37%
On-Target %36%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

34%
10%
Shot Conversion9%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

9%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
4040
59%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

60%
82%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

82%
488.48
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

501.27
0.16
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.22

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
4040
25%10/40
Leading at HT34%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

43%17/40
53%21/40
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

35%14/40
23%9/40
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

23%9/40
57%23/40
HT/FT Same Outcome61%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

65%26/40
90%9/10
Led at HT → Won80%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

71%12/17
44%4/9
Trailed at HT → Recovered33%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

22%2/9

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 40/4040/404040
9%
0-15'13%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

17%
9%
16-30'12%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

15%
16%
31-45'18%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

20%
21%
46-60'17%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

14%
16%
61-75'16%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

17%
30%
76-90+'24%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

18%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 40/4040/404040
65%24/37
Scored First66%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

68%25/37
35%13/37
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

32%12/37
58%14/24
Win when Scoring First59%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

60%15/25
23%3/13
Win when Conceding First20%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

17%2/12
40'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

27'
36'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

39'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 40/4040/404040
38%15/40
Scored after 75'35%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

33%13/40
18%7/40
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

33%13/40
86%12/14
Lead Saved after 75'85%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

84%16/19
14%2/14
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

16%3/19
0%0/40
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

3%1/40

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 40/4040/404040
89%51/57
Open-Play Share83%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

77%51/66
7%4/57
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

20%13/66
4%2/57
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

3%2/66
10%4/39
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

14%7/51
0%0/39
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

2%1/51

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
4040
5.60
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

6.95
3.98
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

3.58
58%
Corner Share62%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

66%
1.28
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

4.20
60%24/40
Match Corners > 8.561%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

63%25/40
40%16/40
Match Corners > 9.548%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

55%22/40
35%14/40
Match Corners > 10.543%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

50%20/40

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 40/4040/404040
2.05
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.90
5%2/40
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

8%3/40
10.85
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

11.55
74%25/34
Match Cards > 3.578%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

82%28/34
34/4034/40
47%16/34
Match Cards > 4.554%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

62%21/34
34/4034/40
66%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

62%