Segunda División·
Regular Season - 42·05/31/2026·04:30 PM
Racing Santander
Racing Santander
DWWWD
4-1
Finished
HT3-0
Cadiz
Cadiz
WDLDL
📍 Estadio El Sardinero, Santander
Season statsSegunda División
Santander41matchesCadiz41matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Segunda División.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
78%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

43%
1589
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1425
70%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

29%
86%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

56%
3.63
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.57

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
4141
1.93
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.05
59%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

27%
17%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

24%
24%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

49%
20%
Clean Sheet23%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

27%
10%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

37%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
4141
2.10
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.98
90%
Scored > 0.577%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

63%
85%
Over 1.576%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

66%
71%
Over 2.561%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

51%
54%
Over 3.537%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

20%
73%
BTTS60%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

46%
41%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

10%
37%
Scored Both Halves26%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

15%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
4141
1.46
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.39
13.00
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

14.59
4.27
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.59
2.85
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.05
67%
Save %67%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

66%
20%
Clean Sheet23%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

27%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
4141
1.48
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

0.89
1.51
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.29
-0.03
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.40
0.65
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.08
0.10
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.10

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
4141
14.05
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

9.98
5.85
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.07
9.93
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

6.05
71%
Box Shot %66%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

61%
42%
On-Target %36%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

31%
15%
Shot Conversion12%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

10%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
4141
52%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

46%
81%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

78%
431.49
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

365.24
0.04
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.11

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
4141
39%16/41
Leading at HT28%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

17%7/41
37%15/41
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

44%18/41
24%10/41
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

39%16/41
56%23/41
HT/FT Same Outcome62%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

68%28/41
81%13/16
Led at HT → Won83%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

86%6/7
40%4/10
Trailed at HT → Recovered26%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

13%2/16

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 41/4141/414141
10%
0-15'17%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

24%
15%
16-30'13%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

12%
14%
31-45'10%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

7%
17%
46-60'12%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

7%
20%
61-75'22%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

24%
24%
76-90+'25%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

26%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 41/4141/414141
60%24/40
Scored First52%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

43%16/37
40%16/40
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

57%21/37
71%17/24
Win when Scoring First67%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

63%10/16
44%7/16
Win when Conceding First24%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

5%1/21
28'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

26'
24'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

36'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 41/4141/414141
44%18/41
Scored after 75'34%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

24%10/41
27%11/41
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

32%13/41
86%19/22
Lead Saved after 75'88%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

90%9/10
14%3/22
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

10%1/10
0%0/41
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/41

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 41/4141/414141
92%81/88
Open-Play Share91%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

90%38/42
6%5/88
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

2%1/42
2%2/88
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

7%3/42
10%6/58
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

11%6/56
0%0/58
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

4%2/56

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
4141
5.73
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.44
4.80
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.27
54%
Corner Share50%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

46%
1.37
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-1.28
76%31/41
Match Corners > 8.570%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

63%26/41
63%26/41
Match Corners > 9.556%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

49%20/41
49%20/41
Match Corners > 10.545%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

41%17/41

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 41/4141/414141
2.80
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.85
17%7/41
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

10%4/41
13.10
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

13.98
95%35/37
Match Cards > 3.590%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

86%30/35
37/4135/41
89%33/37
Match Cards > 4.579%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

69%24/35
37/4135/41
67%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

68%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeSantander at home · Cadiz on the road
2020
2.20
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.00
70%14/20
Win Rate45%

Share of sampled matches won.

20%4/20
20%4/20
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

40%8/20
2.55
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.95
1.40
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.45
25%5/20
Clean Sheet23%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

20%4/20
70%14/20
BTTS60%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

50%10/20
80%16/20
Over 2.565%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

50%10/20
2.24
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

0.90
1.39
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.33