Landesliga - Tirol·
Tirol - 25·06/06/2026·03:00 PM
Telfs
Telfs
LDWLW
VS
Innsbrucker AC
Innsbrucker AC
WWLLW
📍 Sportplatz Telfs Emat, Telfs
Season statsLandesliga - Tirol
Telfs18matchesAC16matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Landesliga - Tirol.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
48%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

59%
1237
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1282
45%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

59%
50%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

59%
4.92
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.77

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1816
1.11
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.62
33%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

50%
11%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

13%
56%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

38%
17%
Clean Sheet18%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

19%
17%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

31%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1816
2.00
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.88
83%
Scored > 0.576%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

69%
94%
Over 1.585%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

75%
83%
Over 2.576%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

69%
61%
Over 3.552%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

44%
67%
BTTS61%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

56%
17%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

38%
35%
Scored Both Halves34%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

33%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1816
2.06
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.25
17%
Clean Sheet18%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

19%

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1816
29%5/17
Leading at HT31%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

33%5/15
24%4/17
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

47%7/15
47%8/17
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

20%3/15
88%15/17
HT/FT Same Outcome74%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

60%9/15
100%5/5
Led at HT → Won90%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

80%4/5
0%0/8
Trailed at HT → Recovered0%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/3

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeTelfs at home · AC on the road
76
1.86
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.83
57%4/7
Win Rate54%

Share of sampled matches won.

50%3/6
29%2/7
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

17%1/6
3.14
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.67
1.14
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.33
43%3/7
Clean Sheet30%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

17%1/6
57%4/7
BTTS62%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

67%4/6
71%5/7
Over 2.569%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

67%4/6