Allsvenskan·
Regular Season - 10·05/31/2026·12:00 PM
Degerfors IF
Degerfors IF
LDLDD
2-2
Finished
HT0-1
IF Brommapojkarna
IF Brommapojkarna
WWLWL
📍 Stora Valla, Degerfors
Season statsAllsvenskan
IF9matchesBrommapojkarna9matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Allsvenskan.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
44%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

57%
1534
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1449
50%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

51%
37%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

63%
2.84
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.71

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
99
1.00
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.56
22%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

44%
33%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

22%
44%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

33%
11%
Clean Sheet11%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

11%
22%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

22%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
99
1.11
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.44
78%
Scored > 0.578%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

78%
89%
Over 1.589%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

89%
56%
Over 2.567%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

78%
11%
Over 3.522%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

33%
67%
BTTS67%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

67%
11%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

33%
22%
Scored Both Halves28%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

33%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
99
1.56
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.56
10.44
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

15.11
3.89
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.78
2.33
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.33
60%
Save %65%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

70%
11%
Clean Sheet11%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

11%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
99
1.14
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.15
1.26
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.56
-0.12
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.41
0.04
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.30
0.09
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.11

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
99
11.78
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

11.00
3.67
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.89
5.89
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.44
50%
Box Shot %59%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

68%
31%
On-Target %33%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

35%
9%
Shot Conversion11%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

13%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
99
49%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

45%
76%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

83%
411.11
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

437.44
-0.06
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.12

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
99
11%1/9
Leading at HT22%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

33%3/9
44%4/9
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

56%5/9
44%4/9
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

11%1/9
44%4/9
HT/FT Same Outcome44%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

44%4/9
100%1/1
Led at HT → Won83%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

67%2/3
50%2/4
Trailed at HT → Recovered25%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/1

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 9/99/999
0%
0-15'7%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

13%
0%
16-30'7%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

13%
11%
31-45'9%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

7%
22%
46-60'14%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

7%
22%
61-75'28%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

33%
44%
76-90+'36%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

27%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 9/99/999
22%2/9
Scored First39%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

56%5/9
78%7/9
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

44%4/9
50%1/2
Win when Scoring First65%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

80%4/5
14%1/7
Win when Conceding First7%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/4
56'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

31'
27'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

35'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 9/99/999
44%4/9
Scored after 75'39%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

33%3/9
33%3/9
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

22%2/9
50%1/2
Lead Saved after 75'65%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

80%4/5
50%1/2
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

20%1/5
0%0/9
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/9

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 9/99/999
100%9/9
Open-Play Share93%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

87%13/15
0%0/9
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

0%0/15
0%0/9
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

13%2/15
20%3/15
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

0%0/12
7%1/15
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/12

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
99
4.44
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.44
4.33
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.78
51%
Corner Share49%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

48%
-0.99
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.35
44%4/9
Match Corners > 8.556%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

67%6/9
33%3/9
Match Corners > 9.539%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

44%4/9
22%2/9
Match Corners > 10.533%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

44%4/9

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 9/99/999
2.22
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.89
0%0/9
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

11%1/9
14.56
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

10.67
50%4/8
Match Cards > 3.567%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

83%5/6
8/96/9
38%3/8
Match Cards > 4.535%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

33%2/6
8/96/9
76%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

65%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeIF at home · Brommapojkarna on the road
55
0.80
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.40
20%1/5
Win Rate30%

Share of sampled matches won.

40%2/5
60%3/5
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

40%2/5
0.80
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.40
2.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.80
0%0/5
Clean Sheet0%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

0%0/5
60%3/5
BTTS60%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

60%3/5
60%3/5
Over 2.570%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

80%4/5
1.00
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.14
1.25
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.28