1. Division·
Regular Season - 9·05/25/2026·03:00 PM
Haugesund
Haugesund
WDLWL
3-1
Finished
HT0-0
Moss
Moss
DWLLW
📍 Haugesund Stadion, Haugesund
Season stats1. Division
Haugesund8matchesMoss8matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in 1. Division.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
53%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

51%
1350
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1398
57%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

47%
49%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

55%
4.26
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.66

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
88
2.00
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.62
63%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

50%
13%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

13%
25%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

38%
38%
Clean Sheet25%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

13%
0%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

13%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
88
2.88
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.63
100%
Scored > 0.594%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

88%
100%
Over 1.594%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

88%
63%
Over 2.569%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

75%
63%
Over 3.556%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

50%
63%
BTTS69%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

75%
25%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

38%
63%
Scored Both Halves38%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

13%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
88
1.63
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.88
38%
Clean Sheet25%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

13%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
88
2.42
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.73
2.23
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

2.37
0.19
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.64
-0.46
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.30
0.28
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
88
-0.11
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
88
50%4/8
Leading at HT38%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

25%2/8
38%3/8
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

25%2/8
13%1/8
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

50%4/8
75%6/8
HT/FT Same Outcome56%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

38%3/8
100%4/4
Led at HT → Won75%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

50%1/2
0%0/1
Trailed at HT → Recovered25%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

50%2/4

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 8/88/888
21%
0-15'14%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

8%
21%
16-30'10%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

0%
0%
31-45'8%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

15%
17%
46-60'12%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

8%
25%
61-75'28%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

31%
17%
76-90+'28%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

38%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 8/88/888
75%6/8
Scored First50%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

25%2/8
25%2/8
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

75%6/8
83%5/6
Win when Scoring First67%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

50%1/2
0%0/2
Win when Conceding First25%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

50%3/6
18'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

25'
18'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

29'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 8/88/888
50%4/8
Scored after 75'44%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

38%3/8
25%2/8
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

13%1/8
100%4/4
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%3/3
0%0/4
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/3
0%0/8
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/8

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 8/88/888
83%20/24
Open-Play Share88%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

92%12/13
13%3/24
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

8%1/13
4%1/24
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/13
0%0/12
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

0%0/15
0%0/12
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/15

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
88
-5.23
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 8/88/888
71%5/7
Match Cards > 3.566%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

60%3/5
7/85/8
29%2/7
Match Cards > 4.534%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

40%2/5
7/85/8
70%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

74%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeHaugesund at home · Moss on the road
34
2.33
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.50
67%2/3
Win Rate58%

Share of sampled matches won.

50%2/4
0%0/3
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

50%2/4
2.33
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.75
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

2.50
33%1/3
Clean Sheet17%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

0%0/4
67%2/3
BTTS71%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

75%3/4
33%1/3
Over 2.567%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

100%4/4
1.46
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.45
1.70
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

2.74