Brasiliense U20·
Regular Season - 4·06/06/2026·06:30 PM
Gama U20
Gama U20
LWLWL
VS
Samambaia U20
Samambaia U20
LDLLW
Last 10Brasiliense U20
U2010matchesU2010matches

Season just started — only a handful of league matches played so far. Every panel below reflects each team's most recent matches across all competitions.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
51%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

39%
1271
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1263
56%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

52%
45%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

26%
5.12
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.00

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1010
1.60
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.20
50%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

30%
10%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

30%
40%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

40%
30%
Clean Sheet25%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

20%
30%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

30%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1010
2.80
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.50
70%
Scored > 0.570%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

70%
90%
Over 1.590%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

90%
80%
Over 2.575%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

70%
70%
Over 3.560%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

50%
50%
BTTS55%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

60%
30%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

20%
50%
Scored Both Halves39%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

29%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1010
1.80
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.60
30%
Clean Sheet25%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

20%

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1010
67%4/6
Leading at HT48%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

29%2/7
17%1/6
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

29%2/7
17%1/6
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

43%3/7
83%5/6
HT/FT Same Outcome70%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

57%4/7
75%3/4
Led at HT → Won63%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

50%1/2
0%0/1
Trailed at HT → Recovered17%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

33%1/3

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeU20 at home · U20 on the road
64
1.50
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.00
50%3/6
Win Rate38%

Share of sampled matches won.

25%1/4
50%3/6
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

50%2/4
3.00
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.00
2.33
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.75
17%1/6
Clean Sheet21%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

25%1/4
50%3/6
BTTS50%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

50%2/4
83%5/6
Over 2.579%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

75%3/4