Who is top of the 1. Lig 2025 table and what's their PPG?

The 1. Lig 2025 table above is sorted by points by default — the top row is the current 1. Lig leader. Each row shows points and points-per-game (PPG) to two decimal places, so a team's pace projects cleanly across the rest of the season. As a rule of thumb across most leagues: above 2.00 PPG is dominant-title pace, 1.80–2.00 is firmly in the title race, 1.50–1.80 is upper-table form, 1.30–1.50 is mid-table, and below 1.00 is bottom-table. Multiply PPG by the 1. Lig 2025 scheduled match count to project a full-season total — useful when comparing clubs with games in hand. Tap the PPG column to re-rank by pace instead of raw points; clubs with games in hand often shuffle when you do.

How do I find 1. Lig 2025 away form?

The Form column on the table above is overall — home plus away combined. Away-form splits live inside the upcoming-fixture rows on the 1. Lig overview: the snapshot shown for each away club is computed strictly from that team's away matches, so PPG, BTTS %, +2.5 %, xG and last-10 values for the visiting side reflect away performance only. When a team's away PPG diverges from their season PPG by more than 0.4 — common with travel-sensitive clubs — that's worth checking against the pre-match 1×2 odds. The /pro-finder workspace exposes the full away-form table with sorting, filters and 14-day backtesting on the away column.

Which 1. Lig 2025 teams are xG underperformers?

An xG underperformer is a 1. Lig club whose actual goals scored sit below the goals their shot quality predicts — chance creation is fine but finishing is cold. Read it from the xGD column on the table above: clubs with positive xGD per match but a points total below their peers at the same PPG bracket are the underperformers. Compare the league-leader column to the bottom-half clubs — when xGD is similar but PPG diverges, finishing variance is doing the work. The reverse (negative xGD, points above peers) is the over-performer profile, where the math says regression eventually catches up over the rest of the 2025 season.

Which 1. Lig 2025 teams concede the most corners?

Sort the Avg Corners column on the table above to see the 1. Lig 2025 clubs allowing the most corners per fixture. Corner concession is a defensive-pressure proxy — clubs that defend deep tend to give up corners in volume, even when they keep clean sheets. The corners-conceded leader for 2025 is the prime target for over-corners bets in their fixtures, especially against high-attempt attacking sides. Cross-reference the same column against xGA (xG against) to separate clubs that concede many corners but few quality chances from clubs that concede both — those second-tier sides are the most exploitable in over-corners + over-2.5 combination markets.

Which 1. Lig 2025 teams have the highest draw percentage?

Calculate the 1. Lig 2025 draw rate from the Drawn (D) column divided by Played (P): a club whose D/P ratio sits above ~35 % is a draw specialist — well above the typical league-wide draw average of 22–28 %. Draw specialists are usually mid-table sides that compete tactically but lack the cutting edge to win, and the 1×2 markets routinely undervalue them on the draw line because casual money flows to home and away wins. The 1. Lig 2025 per-club draw rate is a cleaner read on tactical tightness than goal differential, and a useful filter for double-chance betting markets on this league's fixtures.

How is the 1. Lig 2025 expected points vs actual gap read?

The standings table doesn't yet ship an explicit expected-points column, but the gap reads cleanly from xGD per match (the xGD column above) against PPG. A 1. Lig 2025 club whose xGD per match is significantly higher than their league position implies — say +0.4 xGD per match but a points total typical of a mid-table side — is over-performing on results, and the table understates their level; odds should reprice. The reverse profile (low or negative xGD with a points total typical of a top-of-table club) flags a side relying on finishing variance, where regression is the bet. The Pro Finder workspace carries the full xG-vs-points variance breakdown across every 1. Lig club with the rolling delta, so you can see exactly which sides have been lucky or unlucky to date.

1. Lig

TurkeyLeagueSeason 2025380/380 matches played

1. Lig regular 2025/26 standings — points, PPG, xG, BTTS and corners for all 20 clubs

1. Lig regular 2025/26 clubs ranked by points with form, PPG, xGD, BTTS %, +2.5 % and corner averages — sortable on every column.

Unlock Pro Finder stats

Pro

Premium members get xG, form trends, custom views and full column control on every upcoming match.

14-day backtesting
Unlimited filters
80+ stats · 10k+ combos
Premium sorting
Custom views

Go Premium

Standings

Regular Season Play Offs

											Statsavg. per match
										Form
1 Erzurum BB	38	23	12	3	82	27	+55	81	2.13	DDWWW	92%	45%	50%	47%	0.19	0.06	+0.13	1.71	0.03	2.23	4.42
2 Erokspor	38	21	11	6	81	35	+46	74	1.95	LWWDW	82%	55%	34%	58%	0.16	0.11	+0.05	1.87	0.11	2.48	5.26
3 Amed	38	21	11	6	81	42	+39	74	1.95	DLDDW	87%	58%	34%	55%	0.22	0.13	+0.09	2.16	0.16	2.55	6.03
4 Yeni Çorumspor	38	21	8	9	63	39	+24	71	1.87	WWDDL	79%	50%	29%	58%	0.18	0.10	+0.08	2.11	0.08	2.33	6.58
5 BB Bodrumspor	38	18	10	10	71	39	+32	64	1.68	DDDDW	79%	50%	39%	47%	0.36	0.26	+0.10	1.74	0.16	2.14	4.37
6 Pendikspor	38	16	15	7	58	33	+25	63	1.66	WDDLW	79%	34%	45%	45%	0.30	0.25	+0.05	2.58	0.13	2.83	5.00
7 Keçiörengücü	38	16	12	10	73	43	+30	60	1.58	WLDWW	74%	61%	29%	63%	0.24	0.22	+0.02	2.29	0.05	2.42	4.24
8 Bandırmaspor	38	16	12	10	47	34	+13	60	1.58	DWDDW	68%	34%	45%	39%	0.22	0.20	+0.02	1.97	0.16	2.31	4.00
9 Manisa BBSK	38	16	7	15	57	56	+1	55	1.45	LWWWL	76%	55%	32%	50%	0.11	0.21	-0.10	2.39	0.26	2.81	3.74
10 İstanbulspor	38	13	13	12	57	55	+2	52	1.37	WWWLD	71%	58%	24%	55%	0.13	0.08	+0.05	1.95	0.13	2.29	3.58
11 Sarıyer	38	15	7	16	44	44	0	52	1.37	WLWDW	71%	53%	39%	37%	0.33	0.36	-0.03	2.37	0.08	2.63	4.42
12 Sivasspor	38	13	12	13	44	43	+1	51	1.34	WLLWL	63%	39%	32%	53%	0.27	0.20	+0.07	2.03	0.16	2.59	4.84
13 76 Iğdır Belediyespor	38	13	11	14	52	54	-2	50	1.32	LDWLL	82%	53%	16%	63%	0.34	0.13	+0.21	2.21	0.18	2.85	5.61
14 Van BB	38	13	10	15	52	47	+5	49	1.29	LWLWL	68%	53%	26%	50%	0.22	0.22	0.00	2.29	0.08	2.58	4.26
15 Boluspor	38	14	6	18	61	57	+4	48	1.26	LWLLL	82%	53%	24%	55%	0.22	0.23	-0.01	2.29	0.11	2.97	4.37
16 Ümraniyespor	38	13	7	18	47	51	-4	46	1.21	WLDWL	68%	45%	26%	45%	0.23	0.16	+0.07	1.92	0.18	2.45	4.08
17 Serik Belediyespor	38	11	6	21	44	75	-31	39	1.03	WLDLL	74%	63%	26%	42%	0.15	0.26	-0.11	2.39	0.11	2.71	3.42
18 Sakaryaspor	38	8	11	19	45	69	-24	35	0.92	LDLLD	87%	50%	16%	55%	0.12	0.22	-0.10	2.74	0.26	3.11	3.97
19 Hatayspor	38	2	8	28	33	102	-69	14	0.37	LDLWL	95%	76%	3%	55%	0.20	0.32	-0.12	2.84	0.18	3.35	2.58
20 Adana Demirspor	38	1	3	34	22	169	-147	6	0.16	LLLLW	97%	95%	0%	42%	0.08	0.55	-0.47	1.29	0.18	1.84	1.58

The 1. Lig regular 2025/26 table for Turkey — matches played, wins/draws/losses, goal difference, points and PPG, with the advanced columns serious bettors filter on: last-five form, BTTS %, +2.5 %, clean-sheet %, xGF, xGA, xGD, average cards and corners per fixture. Every cell sortable.

How 1. Lig clubs are ranked

Points decide the 1. Lig 2025/26 order: 3 for a win, 1 for a draw, 0 for a loss. Ties are broken by goal difference, then goals scored, then head-to-head record. The table sorts by points by default; tap any column header to re-rank by PPG, GD, BTTS %, xGD, average corners or any other stat. The coloured bars next to each rank mark this league's qualification and promotion/relegation zones — the exact set varies by competition, and the legend below the table names the zone each band represents.

The 1. Lig 2025/26 form table

The Form column shows the last five 1. Lig matches as a coloured strip — W (green), D (grey), L (red). It's the cleanest read on momentum: a 1.5 PPG club on WWWWW is in title form, the same PPG on LLLLL is in trouble. Sort by Form for the rolling table, or by PPG for the season-long view. Away-form splits sit one click away on each upcoming-fixture row in the 1. Lig fixtures table.

Goal markets: BTTS, +2.5 and clean sheets

BTTS %, +1.5 %, +2.5 % and Clean-sheet % each show the rate of finished 1. Lig 2025/26 matches that hit that market for the given team. A club at 75 % BTTS is making both ends of the over/under 2.5 bet a coin-flip-friendly target; one at 60 % clean-sheet rate is a low-scoring defensive wall. Sort any column to surface the 1. Lig 2025/26 BTTS specialists, the highest +2.5 producers and the clean-sheet leaders side-by-side.

xG, xGD and expected-points underperformers

xGF (expected goals for, per match), xGA (against) and xGD (the difference) describe the underlying chance quality across all finished 1. Lig 2025/26 fixtures. Clubs with positive xGD per match but lower PPG than peers are the xG underperformers — creating enough to finish higher than the table shows. The reverse profile is the over-performer, where finishing has been hot and regression looms. The expected-points-vs-actual gap reads cleanly from xGD against PPG.

Frequently asked questions

Who is top of the 1. Lig 2025/26 table and what's their PPG?: The 1. Lig 2025/26 table above is sorted by points by default — the top row is the current 1. Lig leader. Each row shows points and points-per-game (PPG) to two decimal places, so a team's pace projects cleanly across the rest of the season. As a rule of thumb across most leagues: above 2.00 PPG is dominant-title pace, 1.80–2.00 is firmly in the title race, 1.50–1.80 is upper-table form, 1.30–1.50 is mid-table, and below 1.00 is bottom-table. Multiply PPG by the 1. Lig 2025/26 scheduled match count to project a full-season total — useful when comparing clubs with games in hand. Tap the PPG column to re-rank by pace instead of raw points; clubs with games in hand often shuffle when you do.
How do I find 1. Lig 2025/26 away form?: The Form column on the table above is overall — home plus away combined. Away-form splits live inside the upcoming-fixture rows on the 1. Lig overview: the snapshot shown for each away club is computed strictly from that team's away matches, so PPG, BTTS %, +2.5 %, xG and last-10 values for the visiting side reflect away performance only. When a team's away PPG diverges from their season PPG by more than 0.4 — common with travel-sensitive clubs — that's worth checking against the pre-match 1×2 odds. The /pro-finder workspace exposes the full away-form table with sorting, filters and 14-day backtesting on the away column.
Which 1. Lig 2025/26 teams are xG underperformers?: An xG underperformer is a 1. Lig club whose actual goals scored sit below the goals their shot quality predicts — chance creation is fine but finishing is cold. Read it from the xGD column on the table above: clubs with positive xGD per match but a points total below their peers at the same PPG bracket are the underperformers. Compare the league-leader column to the bottom-half clubs — when xGD is similar but PPG diverges, finishing variance is doing the work. The reverse (negative xGD, points above peers) is the over-performer profile, where the math says regression eventually catches up over the rest of the 2025/26 season.
Which 1. Lig 2025/26 teams concede the most corners?: Sort the Avg Corners column on the table above to see the 1. Lig 2025/26 clubs allowing the most corners per fixture. Corner concession is a defensive-pressure proxy — clubs that defend deep tend to give up corners in volume, even when they keep clean sheets. The corners-conceded leader for 2025/26 is the prime target for over-corners bets in their fixtures, especially against high-attempt attacking sides. Cross-reference the same column against xGA (xG against) to separate clubs that concede many corners but few quality chances from clubs that concede both — those second-tier sides are the most exploitable in over-corners + over-2.5 combination markets.
Which 1. Lig 2025/26 teams have the highest draw percentage?: Calculate the 1. Lig 2025/26 draw rate from the Drawn (D) column divided by Played (P): a club whose D/P ratio sits above ~35 % is a draw specialist — well above the typical league-wide draw average of 22–28 %. Draw specialists are usually mid-table sides that compete tactically but lack the cutting edge to win, and the 1×2 markets routinely undervalue them on the draw line because casual money flows to home and away wins. The 1. Lig 2025/26 per-club draw rate is a cleaner read on tactical tightness than goal differential, and a useful filter for double-chance betting markets on this league's fixtures.
How is the 1. Lig 2025/26 expected points vs actual gap read?: The standings table doesn't yet ship an explicit expected-points column, but the gap reads cleanly from xGD per match (the xGD column above) against PPG. A 1. Lig 2025/26 club whose xGD per match is significantly higher than their league position implies — say +0.4 xGD per match but a points total typical of a mid-table side — is over-performing on results, and the table understates their level; odds should reprice. The reverse profile (low or negative xGD with a points total typical of a top-of-table club) flags a side relying on finishing variance, where regression is the bet. The Pro Finder workspace carries the full xG-vs-points variance breakdown across every 1. Lig club with the rolling delta, so you can see exactly which sides have been lucky or unlucky to date.

Glossary

P: — Matches played in the current season before this fixture.
W: — Wins recorded in finished matches before this fixture.
D: — Draws recorded in finished matches before this fixture.
L: — Losses recorded in finished matches before this fixture.
Streak: — Consecutive run of identical results — e.g. W4 means four wins in a row going into this match.
PPG: — Points per game — total points divided by matches played.
Overall: — Composite team strength rating combining results, xG and form — pre-match snapshot before this fixture.
LTQ: — Long-term quality — a slower-moving baseline rating that smooths short-term variance.
Hype: — Short-term momentum index — how the team has trended over its most recent matches.
Last 10: — Outcome stripe of the team's last 10 league matches (W/D/L), most recent on the right.
Form: — Composite quality indices (Overall, LTQ, Hype) reflecting the team's pre-match level.
GF: — Goals For — total goals scored across prior season matches.
GA: — Goals Against — total goals conceded across prior season matches.
GD: — Goal difference — goals scored minus goals conceded across prior season matches.
Goals Scored: — Average goals scored per prior match.
Goals Conceded: — Average goals conceded per prior match.
Avg Total Goals: — Mean total goals across prior matches.
Clean sheet: — A match in which the team did not concede a goal.
Clean Sheet %: — Share of prior matches finished without conceding a goal.
BTTS: — Both teams to score — the share of prior matches where both sides scored at least once.
BTTS %: — Share of prior matches where both teams scored.
+1.5 %: — Share of prior matches that finished with two or more total goals.
+2.5 %: — Share of prior matches with three or more total goals.
xG: — Expected goals — a chance-quality measure expressing how many goals an average team would have scored from the shots taken.
xGF: — Mean expected goals for, averaged across prior matches.
xGA: — Mean expected goals against, averaged across prior matches.
xGD: — Expected goal difference — xGF minus xGA, a per-match indicator of underlying dominance.
1×2: — Bookmaker's pre-match decimal odds for home win / draw / away win — not an average, this fixture's actual price.
O/U 2.5: — Bookmaker's pre-match odds for Over and Under 2.5 total goals — this fixture's actual prices.
BTTS odds: — Bookmaker's pre-match odds for both teams to score — Yes and No prices for this fixture.
Avg Cards: — Mean total cards (yellow plus red) per prior match.
Avg Corners: — Mean corners per prior match.