2. Division - Group 2·
Regular Season - 10·06/14/2026·01:00 PM
Eidsvold
Eidsvold
WWWWW
VS
Levanger
Levanger
WLWWL
📍 Myhrer Stadion
Season stats2. Division - Group 2
Eidsvold9matchesLevanger9matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in 2. Division - Group 2.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
88%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

70%
1358
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1302
76%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

70%
100%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

70%
3.97
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.96

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
99
2.56
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

2.00
78%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

67%
22%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

0%
0%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

33%
56%
Clean Sheet44%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%
22%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

11%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
99
2.56
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.00
78%
Scored > 0.583%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

89%
67%
Over 1.572%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

78%
67%
Over 2.572%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

78%
44%
Over 3.539%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

33%
44%
BTTS50%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

56%
44%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

33%
67%
Scored Both Halves61%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

56%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
99
0.56
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.22
56%
Clean Sheet44%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
99
56%5/9
Leading at HT50%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

44%4/9
44%4/9
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

44%4/9
0%0/9
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

11%1/9
78%7/9
HT/FT Same Outcome67%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

56%5/9
100%5/5
Led at HT → Won100%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%4/4
0/0
Trailed at HT → Recovered

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/1

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 9/99/999
22%
0-15'16%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

11%
17%
16-30'17%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

16%
13%
31-45'17%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

21%
13%
46-60'12%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

11%
26%
61-75'24%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

21%
9%
76-90+'15%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

21%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 9/99/999
86%6/7
Scored First65%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

44%4/9
14%1/7
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

56%5/9
100%6/6
Win when Scoring First100%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

100%4/4
100%1/1
Win when Conceding First70%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

40%2/5
30'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

26'
2'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

26'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 9/99/999
22%2/9
Scored after 75'28%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

33%3/9
22%2/9
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

33%3/9
100%7/7
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%5/5
0%0/7
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/5
0%0/9
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/9

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 9/99/999
96%22/23
Open-Play Share85%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

74%14/19
4%1/23
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

21%4/19
0%0/23
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

5%1/19
20%1/5
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

0%0/10
0%0/5
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/10

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 9/99/999
43%3/7
Match Cards > 3.557%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

71%5/7
7/97/9
14%1/7
Match Cards > 4.521%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

29%2/7
7/97/9
67%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

73%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeEidsvold at home · Levanger on the road
45
2.50
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

2.40
75%3/4
Win Rate78%

Share of sampled matches won.

80%4/5
0%0/4
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

20%1/5
2.75
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.80
0.50
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.20
50%2/4
Clean Sheet35%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

20%1/5
50%2/4
BTTS55%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

60%3/5
75%3/4
Over 2.568%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

60%3/5