Second League - Group 2·
Group 2 - 12·06/14/2026·03:00 PM
Cherepovets
Cherepovets
DWLLW
VS
Irkutsk
Irkutsk
DLWLL
Season statsSecond League - Group 2
Cherepovets10matchesIrkutsk9matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Second League - Group 2.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
54%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

47%
1284
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1343
61%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

42%
46%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

52%
2.93
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.70

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
109
1.90
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

0.78
60%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

22%
10%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

11%
30%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

67%
40%
Clean Sheet20%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

0%
10%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

44%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
109
1.60
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.89
90%
Scored > 0.573%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

56%
70%
Over 1.568%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

67%
60%
Over 2.558%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

56%
40%
Over 3.526%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

11%
50%
BTTS53%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

56%
20%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

22%
20%
Scored Both Halves21%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

22%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
109
1.30
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.56
40%
Clean Sheet20%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

0%

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
109
50%5/10
Leading at HT36%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

22%2/9
30%3/10
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

44%4/9
20%2/10
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

33%3/9
80%8/10
HT/FT Same Outcome57%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

33%3/9
100%5/5
Led at HT → Won75%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

50%1/2
0%0/2
Trailed at HT → Recovered17%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

33%1/3

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 10/109/9109
0%
0-15'0%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

0%
25%
16-30'31%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

38%
25%
31-45'25%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

25%
25%
46-60'31%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

38%
13%
61-75'6%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

0%
13%
76-90+'6%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

0%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 10/109/9109
60%6/10
Scored First47%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

33%3/9
40%4/10
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

67%6/9
100%6/6
Win when Scoring First67%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

33%1/3
0%0/4
Win when Conceding First8%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

17%1/6
40'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

26'
32'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

31'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 10/109/9109
10%1/10
Scored after 75'5%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

0%0/9
40%4/10
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

11%1/9
100%6/6
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%2/2
0%0/6
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/2
20%2/10
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/9

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 10/109/9109
100%16/16
Open-Play Share88%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

75%6/8
0%0/16
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

25%2/8
0%0/16
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/8
23%3/13
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

13%2/15
0%0/13
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/15

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 10/109/9109
0/0
Match Cards > 3.5

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

100%1/1
0/101/9
0/0
Match Cards > 4.5

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

0%0/1
0/101/9
100%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

50%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeCherepovets at home · Irkutsk on the road
54
1.80
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

0.25
60%3/5
Win Rate30%

Share of sampled matches won.

0%0/4
40%2/5
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

75%3/4
1.20
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.00
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

2.25
60%3/5
Clean Sheet30%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

0%0/4
20%1/5
BTTS48%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

75%3/4
40%2/5
Over 2.557%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

75%3/4