Superettan·
Regular Season - 12·06/14/2026·11:00 AM
Norrby IF
Norrby IF
LLWDD
VS
Oddevold
Oddevold
LLWWD
Season statsSuperettan
IF11matchesOddevold11matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Superettan.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
46%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

51%
1439
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1398
51%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

54%
41%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

47%
3.04
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.09

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1111
0.91
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.36
9%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

36%
64%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

27%
27%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

36%
0%
Clean Sheet5%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

9%
18%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

0%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1111
1.36
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.91
82%
Scored > 0.591%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

100%
91%
Over 1.591%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

91%
55%
Over 2.568%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

82%
36%
Over 3.545%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

55%
82%
BTTS86%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

91%
9%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

27%
9%
Scored Both Halves27%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

45%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1111
1.64
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.73
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

13.00
0/111/11
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

6.00
0/112/11
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

4.00
0/111/11
Save %

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

33%
0/112/11
0%
Clean Sheet5%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

9%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1111
1.53
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.49
1.08
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.77
0.45
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.28
-0.12
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.15
0.14
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.19

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1111
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

8.00
0/111/11
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

5.00
0/112/11
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

4.00
0/111/11
Box Shot %

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

50%
0/111/11
On-Target %

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

125%
0/111/11
Shot Conversion

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

13%
0/111/11

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1111
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

46%
0/112/11
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

65%
0/111/11
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

318.00
0/111/11
-0.16
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.09

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1111
45%5/11
Leading at HT59%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

73%8/11
18%2/11
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

18%2/11
36%4/11
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

9%1/11
27%3/11
HT/FT Same Outcome36%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

45%5/11
0%0/5
Led at HT → Won25%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

50%4/8
50%2/4
Trailed at HT → Recovered25%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/1

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 11/1111/111111
21%
0-15'27%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

33%
21%
16-30'15%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

10%
7%
31-45'11%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

14%
14%
46-60'14%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

14%
14%
61-75'12%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

10%
21%
76-90+'20%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

19%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 11/1111/111111
36%4/11
Scored First59%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

82%9/11
64%7/11
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

18%2/11
0%0/4
Win when Scoring First22%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

44%4/9
14%1/7
Win when Conceding First7%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/2
10'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

18'
35'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

28'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 11/1111/111111
27%3/11
Scored after 75'32%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

36%4/11
36%4/11
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

55%6/11
0%0/2
Lead Saved after 75'30%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

60%3/5
100%2/2
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

40%2/5
9%1/11
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/11

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 11/1111/111111
86%12/14
Open-Play Share90%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

95%20/21
7%1/14
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

5%1/21
7%1/14
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/21
0%0/19
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

0%0/19
11%2/19
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/19

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1111
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

7.50
0/112/11
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.00
0/112/11
Corner Share

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

65%
0/112/11
-1.00
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

3.56
0/0
Match Corners > 8.5

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

100%2/2
0/112/11
0/0
Match Corners > 9.5

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

50%1/2
0/112/11
0/0
Match Corners > 10.5

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

50%1/2
0/112/11

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 11/1111/111111
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.33
0/113/11
0/0
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

0%0/3
0/113/11
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

11.00
0/113/11
22%2/9
Match Cards > 3.524%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

25%2/8
9/118/11
11%1/9
Match Cards > 4.518%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

25%2/8
9/118/11
68%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

59%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeIF at home · Oddevold on the road
45
1.25
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.40
25%1/4
Win Rate33%

Share of sampled matches won.

40%2/5
25%1/4
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

40%2/5
1.75
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.20
1.75
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

2.20
0%0/4
Clean Sheet0%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

0%0/5
75%3/4
BTTS88%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

100%5/5
75%3/4
Over 2.588%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

100%5/5
1.53
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.49
1.08
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.77