Catarinense - 2·
Regular Season - 10·06/14/2026·07:00 PM
Caravaggio
Caravaggio
WDWDW
VS
Fluminense-SC
Fluminense-SC
LLLLD
Neutral📍 Estadio da Montanha, Nova Veneza
Season statsCatarinense - 2
Caravaggio9matchesFluminense-SC9matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Catarinense - 2.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
66%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

42%
1246
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1266
55%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

53%
76%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

30%
4.00
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

1.30

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
99
2.00
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.11
56%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

33%
33%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

11%
11%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

56%
33%
Clean Sheet28%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

22%
0%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

33%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
99
2.78
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.78
100%
Scored > 0.583%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

67%
100%
Over 1.572%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

44%
78%
Over 2.556%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

33%
56%
Over 3.533%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

11%
67%
BTTS56%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

44%
22%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

11%
67%
Scored Both Halves33%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

0%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
99
1.11
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.11
33%
Clean Sheet28%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

22%

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
99
78%7/9
Leading at HT44%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

11%1/9
11%1/9
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

44%4/9
11%1/9
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

44%4/9
78%7/9
HT/FT Same Outcome61%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

44%4/9
71%5/7
Led at HT → Won86%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%1/1
0%0/1
Trailed at HT → Recovered13%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

25%1/4

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 6/97/999
17%
0-15'8%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

0%
17%
16-30'8%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

0%
17%
31-45'25%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

33%
22%
46-60'28%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

33%
11%
61-75'14%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

17%
17%
76-90+'17%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

17%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 6/97/999
100%6/6
Scored First64%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

29%2/7
0%0/6
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

71%5/7
50%3/6
Win when Scoring First75%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

100%2/2
0/0
Win when Conceding First

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

20%1/5
18'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

51'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

43'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 6/97/999
50%3/6
Scored after 75'32%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

14%1/7
50%3/6
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

29%2/7
75%3/4
Lead Saved after 75'88%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%2/2
25%1/4
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/2
0%0/6
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/7

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 6/97/999
100%18/18
Open-Play Share100%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

100%6/6
0%0/18
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

0%0/6
0%0/18
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/6
0%0/7
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

0%0/7
14%1/7
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/7

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 6/97/999
100%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

100%