Elitettan·
Regular Season - 9·06/14/2026·11:00 AM
Umeå W
Umeå W
LLWWD
VS
Linköping W
Linköping W
WWWWD
Neutral📍 Umea Energi Arena, Umea
Season statsElitettan
W8matchesW8matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Elitettan.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
47%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

78%
1317
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1217
48%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

68%
45%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

88%
2.95
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.56

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
88
1.75
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

2.50
50%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

75%
25%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

25%
25%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

0%
25%
Clean Sheet38%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

50%
25%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

13%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
88
2.00
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.00
75%
Scored > 0.581%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

88%
100%
Over 1.588%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

75%
50%
Over 2.550%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

50%
50%
Over 3.544%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

38%
50%
BTTS50%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

50%
25%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

38%
38%
Scored Both Halves38%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

38%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
88
1.25
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.75
25%
Clean Sheet38%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

50%

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
88
50%4/8
Leading at HT56%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

63%5/8
13%1/8
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

25%2/8
38%3/8
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

13%1/8
75%6/8
HT/FT Same Outcome75%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

75%6/8
75%3/4
Led at HT → Won88%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%5/5
33%1/3
Trailed at HT → Recovered67%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

100%1/1

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 8/88/888
13%
0-15'10%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

6%
13%
16-30'19%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

25%
13%
31-45'19%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

25%
7%
46-60'10%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

13%
13%
61-75'10%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

6%
40%
76-90+'33%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

25%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 8/88/888
38%3/8
Scored First62%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

86%6/7
63%5/8
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

14%1/7
67%2/3
Win when Scoring First83%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

100%6/6
40%2/5
Win when Conceding First20%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/1
16'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

27'
25'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

11'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 8/88/888
50%4/8
Scored after 75'44%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

38%3/8
38%3/8
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

13%1/8
75%3/4
Lead Saved after 75'88%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%6/6
25%1/4
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/6
0%0/8
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/8

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 8/88/888
100%15/15
Open-Play Share100%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

100%16/16
0%0/15
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

0%0/16
0%0/15
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/16
0%0/11
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

17%1/6
9%1/11
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/6

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 8/88/888
33%1/3
Match Cards > 3.533%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

33%1/3
3/83/8
33%1/3
Match Cards > 4.533%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

33%1/3
3/83/8
67%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

92%