Kakkonen - Lohko C·
Group C·06/14/2026·01:00 PM
Vaajakoski
Vaajakoski
WDWLL
VS
TP-47
TP-47
DWDWW
📍 Vaajakosken keskuskentta, Vaajakoski
Season statsKakkonen - Lohko C
Vaajakoski8matchesTP-478matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Kakkonen - Lohko C.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
41%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

71%
1262
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1241
39%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

60%
43%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

82%
5.03
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

4.18

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
88
0.88
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

2.00
25%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

50%
13%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

50%
63%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

0%
13%
Clean Sheet13%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

13%
25%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

0%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
88
1.88
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.13
75%
Scored > 0.588%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

100%
75%
Over 1.588%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

100%
63%
Over 2.563%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

63%
63%
Over 3.550%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

38%
63%
BTTS75%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

88%
13%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

38%
38%
Scored Both Halves50%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

63%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
88
2.63
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.38
13%
Clean Sheet13%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

13%

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
88
13%1/8
Leading at HT19%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

25%2/8
50%4/8
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

63%5/8
38%3/8
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

13%1/8
25%2/8
HT/FT Same Outcome31%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

38%3/8
0%0/1
Led at HT → Won25%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

50%1/2
33%1/3
Trailed at HT → Recovered67%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

100%1/1

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 8/87/888
20%
0-15'25%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

31%
7%
16-30'7%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

8%
13%
31-45'14%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

15%
13%
46-60'22%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

31%
27%
61-75'13%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

0%
20%
76-90+'18%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

15%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 8/87/888
50%4/8
Scored First61%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

71%5/7
50%4/8
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

29%2/7
50%2/4
Win when Scoring First45%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

40%2/5
0%0/4
Win when Conceding First25%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

50%1/2
34'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

25'
32'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

11'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 8/87/888
50%4/8
Scored after 75'39%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

29%2/7
38%3/8
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

14%1/7
0/0
Lead Saved after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%2/2
0/0
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/2
0%0/8
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/7

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 8/87/888
100%15/15
Open-Play Share100%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

100%13/13
0%0/15
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

0%0/13
0%0/15
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/13
5%1/21
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

9%1/11
0%0/21
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

9%1/11

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 8/87/888
50%3/6
Match Cards > 3.542%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

33%2/6
6/86/8
33%2/6
Match Cards > 4.533%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

33%2/6
6/86/8
67%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

68%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeVaajakoski at home · TP-47 on the road
44
0.75
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

2.50
25%1/4
Win Rate50%

Share of sampled matches won.

75%3/4
75%3/4
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

0%0/4
2.50
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.75
3.50
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.75
0%0/4
Clean Sheet13%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

25%1/4
75%3/4
BTTS75%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

75%3/4
75%3/4
Over 2.563%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

50%2/4