Løgmanssteypid

Faroe IslandsCupSeason 20268 matches played

Unlock Pro Finder stats

Pro

Premium members get xG, form trends, custom views and full column control on every upcoming match.

  • 14-day backtesting
  • Unlimited filters
  • 80+ stats · 10k+ combos
  • Premium sorting
  • Custom views
Go Premium

Upcoming Matches

2 matches
MatchOVRHYPELTQ
Jun 24
13:00
NSI RunavikNSI Runavik
KI KlaksvikKI Klaksvik
59%82%
56%83%
63%81%
Jun 24
13:00
Vikingur GotaVikingur Gota
HB TorshavnHB Torshavn
66%53%
69%50%
62%56%

Recent Results

6 matches
MatchOVRHYPELTQ1X2
Semi-finals
May 14
10:00
FT
HB TorshavnHB Torshavn2
Vikingur GotaVikingur Gota1
52%60%
48%59%
57%62%
12.23
X3.28
22.80
May 13
13:30
FT
KI KlaksvikKI Klaksvik4
NSI RunavikNSI Runavik2
73%70%
70%66%
76%74%
11.72
X3.59
23.90
Quarter-finals
Apr 30
13:30
FT
07 Vestur07 Vestur0
NSI RunavikNSI Runavik4
51%74%
61%79%
40%69%
19.00
X5.75
21.21
Apr 29
13:30
FT
HB TorshavnHB Torshavn3
B36 TorshavnB36 Torshavn1
49%82%
36%90%
62%75%
1
X
2
Apr 29
13:30
FT
B68B680
KI KlaksvikKI Klaksvik3
57%80%
68%85%
45%76%
111.90
X6.80
21.15
Apr 29
13:30
FT
Vikingur GotaVikingur Gota5
HoyvíkHoyvík0
62%36%
71%37%
54%35%
11.05
X11.00
224.00

Standings

Semi-finals

MAY 13 · FTL1L2Agg
KI KlaksvikKI Klaksvik
44
NSI RunavikNSI Runavik
22
MAY 14 · FTL1L2Agg
HB TorshavnHB Torshavn
22
Vikingur GotaVikingur Gota
11

Quarter-finals

APR 29 · FTL1
HB TorshavnHB Torshavn
3
B36 TorshavnB36 Torshavn
1
APR 29 · FTL1
B68B68
0
KI KlaksvikKI Klaksvik
3
APR 29 · FTL1
Vikingur GotaVikingur Gota
5
HoyvíkHoyvík
0
APR 30 · FTL1
07 Vestur07 Vestur
0
NSI RunavikNSI Runavik
4

1st Round

APR 15 · FTL1
SuduroySuduroy
0
B36 TorshavnB36 Torshavn
3
APR 15 · AETL1
HoyvíkHoyvík
4
TBTB
1
APR 15 · FTL1
KI KlaksvikKI Klaksvik
6
ÍF IIÍF II
0
APR 15 · FTL1
HB TorshavnHB Torshavn
2
B71B71
0
APR 15 · FTL1
B68B68
7
MBMB
0
APR 16 · FTL1
07 Vestur07 Vestur
1
SkálaSkála
0
APR 16 · FTL1
EB / StreymurEB / Streymur
1
NSI RunavikNSI Runavik
7
APR 16 · FTL1
Vikingur GotaVikingur Gota
5
ABAB
1

Track Løgmanssteypid 2026 in Faroe Islands with the live league table, the next round of fixtures and the most recent results — and the same advanced-stat columns serious bettors compare side-by-side: points per game (PPG), expected goals (xG), both-teams-to-score percentage, clean-sheet rate, average corners and last-10 form. Every metric recalculates within a few hours of each full-time whistle, so the snapshot you see reflects the most recently completed Løgmanssteypid round.

About the Løgmanssteypid 2026 season

Every Løgmanssteypid 2026 fixture flows into the same dataset behind our Pro Finder and Portal Pulse views — the points, goal difference, xG and last-10 form you see in the table are the exact numbers driving every betting view across the site. Each cell recalculates within a few hours of each full-time whistle, and the matches-played count next to the season badge in the header shows how many Løgmanssteypid 2026 fixtures have already counted toward the standings — so you can verify the table reflects the latest completed round.

How to read the Løgmanssteypid standings

Read the table left-to-right: rank, club, matches played (P), wins/draws/losses (W/D/L), goals for and against (GF/GA), goal difference (GD), points and PPG. The Form column shows the last five results as a colored strip (W = green, D = gray, L = red). The advanced block — when available — adds BTTS %, +1.5 %, +2.5 %, clean-sheet %, xGF, xGA and xGD per match, plus average yellow/red cards and corners per fixture. Sort any column by tapping its header.

Form, xG and underperformers

Form, points and xG don't always agree. A team can sit on 1.6 PPG with xG that says 2.1 — the classic xG underperformer profile, where shot quality outpaces finishing. The reverse is also visible: lucky finishing eventually regresses toward xG. The Form column and the xGD column together flag teams whose underlying performance is trending ahead of or behind their actual Løgmanssteypid 2026 points. Bettors use this gap to find clubs whose odds haven't yet repriced their level

Upcoming fixtures and recent results

Below the table you'll find the next round of Løgmanssteypid fixtures with each team's pre-match snapshot — last 10 form, PPG, BTTS %, +2.5 %, xG, average corners and the 1×2, over/under 2.5 and BTTS pre-match decimal odds. The Recent Results block above the standings shows the two most-recently completed rounds with the same advanced columns so you can compare what just happened to what's coming

Frequently asked questions

Which team has the best form in Løgmanssteypid 2026?
The Form column on the standings table above shows the last five Løgmanssteypid 2026 results for every club as a colored WDL strip. Sort the table by PPG (points per game) to see in-form sides over the full Løgmanssteypid run — anything above 2.0 PPG is dominant-title pace, 1.5–2.0 is upper-table form, 1.0–1.5 is mid-table, and below 1.0 is bottom-of-table form. Exact thresholds vary with the Løgmanssteypid 2026 match count, so multiply PPG by the season's scheduled matches to project a full-season point total. For a rolling 10-match read instead of season-long, the upcoming-fixtures table below the standings shows each team's last 10 results as a sparkline-style strip alongside their season PPG, so you can spot Løgmanssteypid sides whose recent run differs sharply from their season average.
Which Løgmanssteypid 2026 teams are xG underperformers?
An xG underperformer is a team whose actual goals scored sit below the goals their shot quality predicts — they're creating chances but not converting. Open the standings advanced block and look at xGF (expected goals for, averaged per match) against the team's actual goal-scoring rate; clubs with high xGF and low actual goals are the underperformers. The reverse profile — high actual goals, low xG — usually regresses. xGD (xG difference, xGF − xGA per match) is the single best summary number: trending positive while points lag means the table understates the side's underlying quality in Løgmanssteypid 2026.
How do I find Løgmanssteypid 2026 away form?
Away-form splits are surfaced inside each upcoming-match row: the snapshot you see for the away club is computed strictly from that team's away fixtures, so PPG, last 10, BTTS %, +2.5 % and xG values represent away performance only. On the standings page itself the Form column is overall (home plus away combined). When a team's away PPG diverges sharply from their season PPG — common with travel-sensitive clubs — that's a betting signal worth checking against the pre-match 1×2 odds shown in the same row.
What does PPG mean in the Løgmanssteypid table?
PPG is points-per-game — total points divided by matches played, expressed to two decimal places. It's the cleanest comparison metric when teams have played different numbers of matches (postponements, mid-season cup runs, midweek juggling). As a rule of thumb across most leagues: 2.00 PPG is dominant-title pace, 1.50 is upper-table form, 1.30 is mid-table, and 1.00 puts a club in the bottom-table conversation. Multiply PPG by the Løgmanssteypid 2026 match count to project a season total — useful when comparing clubs with games in hand. PPG is also more stable than raw points across rolling 10-match windows, which is why the upcoming-fixtures table below uses it as the headline pace column.
How often does Løgmanssteypid 2026 data refresh?
Løgmanssteypid 2026 match results, standings, PPG, xG, BTTS %, clean-sheet % and last-10 form re-aggregate within a few hours after each match completes — refreshed continuously through the matchday but not live. Pre-match odds refresh continuously up to kickoff. The matches-played count next to the season badge in the header shows how many of the scheduled Løgmanssteypid 2026 fixtures have already counted toward the table, so you can verify the standings reflect the latest completed round at a glance.
How is the Løgmanssteypid 2026 expected points vs actual points compared?
We don't yet show an explicit expected-points column on this table, but you can read the gap from xGD and PPG together. A team whose xGD per match is significantly higher than their points-per-game ratio is over-performing on results (xG says they should be higher, table says they're not — chance creation isn't translating into wins). The Pro Finder view (linked above when available) carries the full xG-vs-points variance breakdown across every Løgmanssteypid club, flagging the biggest gaps both ways.